From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh2Vu-0005BA-B5 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:46:50 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2012 10:36:05 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="155565834" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.169]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2012 10:36:05 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:36:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1911542.yM0phlYVn0@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.2.0-25-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: getting rid of SRC_URI_append uses with "+=" X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:46:50 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday 19 June 2012 11:04:06 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > a while back, i pointed out odd instances of: > > meta/recipes-support/gmp/gmp_5.0.4.bb:SRC_URI_append += > "file://use-includedir.patch \ > meta/recipes-graphics/tslib/tslib_1.0.bb:SRC_URI_append_qemumips += " > file://32bitBE-support.patch" > meta/recipes-graphics/tslib/tslib_1.0.bb:SRC_URI_append_qemuppc += " > file://32bitBE-support.patch" > meta/recipes-sato/leafpad/leafpad_0.8.18.1.bb:SRC_URI_append_poky += " > file://owl-menu.patch;apply=yes " > > that is, the apparent redundancy of using "+=" with SRC_URI_append. > anyone want to clean those up, just for the sake of clarity? Sounds good to me, would you mind sending a patch to do this? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre