From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B216B478 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2013 13:19:39 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,781,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="373635078" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.205]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2013 13:19:37 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Chris Larson , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 21:19:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1987043.I59naQdUL0@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.8.0-27-generic; KDE/4.10.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: RFC: meta-ro-rootfs approach and volatiles vs tmpfiles.d X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:19:39 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday 30 July 2013 11:26:58 Chris Larson wrote: > I forgot to mention, we also need to focus on improving the oe-core systemd > support, and the feature parity between sysvinit and systemd images. Some > are missing systemd support at all still (e.g. dropbear's service files are > still in meta-systemd), and others don't behave the same between the two. > For example, were we to pull over those dropbear service files, the > dropbear sysvinit script would behave differently than the service files, > and dropbear would behave differently than openssh. > > I don't know if that's a priority for the Yocto 1.5 release, but it > probably should be. Thanks for bringing this up. There's a bug open for this, but I'd like to stress that people need not wait for someone else to get around to it. There have already been some patches from Mentor folks to start getting this support moved across (although not yet merged due to earlier lack of a concrete resolution on the issue of unpackaged unit files, which is now resolved). Further help from anyone would be very much appreciated: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4420 Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre