From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911A76AFC2 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 16:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2013 09:37:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,846,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="378643112" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.201]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2013 09:37:21 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: "Burton, Ross" Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:37:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1991130.heSQ5hX7rv@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.8.0-27-generic; KDE/4.10.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] yasm: add from meta-oe and tweak X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:37:21 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday 09 August 2013 17:32:58 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 9 August 2013 09:59, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > +SUMMARY = "x86 (SSE) assembler supporting NASM and GAS-syntaxes" > > Does this mean we can drop nasm to avoid having numerous assemblers in > oe-core? You can't feed them after midnight you know. I don't know what the comparison between the two is, but I suspect they are not interchangeable. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre