From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rpjday@crashcourse.ca,
OE Core mailing list <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] why would ASSUME_PROVIDED recipes be built anyway?
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 22:47:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1acc463784821951790b0a3cf3ee23a6b02aaa68.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daa91ca5-ef8c-bb83-7079-3d03ace27a8a@crashcourse.ca>
On Wed, 2026-04-08 at 06:33 -0700, Robert P. J. Day via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>
> puzzled by something i just noticed ... the documentation for
> "ASSUME_PROVIDED":"
>
> https://docs.yoctoproject.org/ref-manual/variables.html#term-ASSUME_PROVIDED
>
> clearly suggests that these represent recipes that would not be built
> as they are already on the host, the example given there is
> "git-native".
>
> however, in a walnascar-based build i just built, native recipes
> that were listed in ASSUME_PROVIDED were built anyway, even though
> they are clearly on my Debian 13 host, "git-native" among them. in
> fact, a number of recipes i checked appear to all have been built from
> scratch, despite being listed in ASSUME_PROVIDED.
>
> as a test, if i then tried to "cleanall" such a recipe, i got the
> perfectly reasonable:
>
>
> $ bitbake -c cleanall git-native
> ... snip ...
> WARNING: Explicit target "git-native" is in ASSUME_PROVIDED, ignoring
>
>
> is there some reason that something listed in ASSUME_PROVIDED will be
> fetched and built anyway? is it a version thing?
Some of the recipes have a PROVIDES for XXX-replacement-native and you
can build/depend on that.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 13:34 why would ASSUME_PROVIDED recipes be built anyway? Robert P. J. Day
2026-04-08 21:47 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2026-04-08 21:53 ` [OE-core] " Robert P. J. Day
2026-04-08 21:59 ` Richard Purdie
2026-04-08 22:07 ` Robert P. J. Day
2026-04-09 17:05 ` Robert P. J. Day
2026-04-09 20:13 ` Richard Purdie
2026-04-10 10:51 ` Robert P. J. Day
2026-04-10 13:05 ` Antonin Godard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1acc463784821951790b0a3cf3ee23a6b02aaa68.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox