Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] base/bitbake.conf: Rework DISTRO_FEATURES and MACHINE_FEATURES default handling

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sun, 2026-04-26 at 09:28 +0200, Böszörményi Zoltán wrote:
> I found via git bisect that this breaks my builds.
> 
> It breaks two things:
> 
> 1.
> 
> With DISTRO_FEATURES containing seccomp (e.g. when using
> meta-virtualization and/or meta-security), this libseccomp-native
> is not found by gnutls-native anymore. Sure enough, the libseccomp
> recipe does not have BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk" like
> gnutls has. So this change has at least some good points to
> point out pre-existing issues.
> 
> 2.
> 
> A circular dependency occurs:
> 
> ERROR: Task 
> virtual:native:/mnt2/zozo/yocto-6.0-arm/conf/../layers/openembedded-
> core/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-
> linux_2.41.3.bb:do_create_recipe_spdx 
> has circular dependency on 
> /mnt2/zozo/yocto-6.0-arm/conf/../layers/openembedded-
> core/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-systemctl-
> native_259.5.bb:do_create_recipe_spdx
> ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1
> 
> Adding INHERIT += "nospdx" does not fix this and none of
> the layers have any bbappend that would explain this.
> 
> Using the preceding commit fixes the build even without adding
> the necessary BBCLASSEXTEND incantation to libseccomp.

I tried to reproduce this by including meta-virtualization, using a
systemd based DISTRO (poky-altcfg), setting seccomp in my
DISTRO_FEATURES and building both util-linux-native and systemd-
systemctl-native (and then world). I wasn't able to reproduce.

How do I reproduce it?

Cheers,

Richard