From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QbWCH-0005GH-QJ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:11:14 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2011 04:07:31 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,437,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="19664004" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.17.88]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2011 04:07:29 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:07:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-8-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; ) References: <674a391015f3cdebe891ae7e8439aea48698982e.1309239001.git.dexuan.cui@intel.com> <3819C41B-FF96-45FD-8265-8EFC9F73E771@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <3819C41B-FF96-45FD-8265-8EFC9F73E771@dominion.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201106281207.23516.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] base.bbclass: show layer's branches/revisions in the banner info X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:11:14 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tuesday 28 June 2011 07:45:09 Koen Kooi wrote: > So it works as expected, but the output is a bit confusing. I have a few > (conflicting) suggestions: > > 1) replace _BRANCH and _REVISION with ' branch' and ' revision', e.g.: > > meta-archos branch = "master" > meta-archos revision = "413933fb5f62574e38a9a1e38905ba6e9c1be4ad" > > 2) for the extra layers put branch and revision on a single line: > > meta-archos = "master/413933fb5f62574e38a9a1e38905ba6e9c1be4ad" I'd go with option 2 over 1, personally - the list gets rather long on something like Angstrom, better to keep it short. > 3) Move the revision info down, e..g > > OE Build Configuration: > BB_VERSION = "1.13.1" > TARGET_ARCH = "arm" > TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi" > MACHINE = "beagleboard" > DISTRO = "angstrom" > DISTRO_VERSION = "v2011.06-core" > TARGET_FPU = "hard" > METADATA_BRANCH = "master" > METADATA_REVISION = "364ca0d2d0399c8cc6d3b3fc28308e1e14673544" > meta-angstrom_BRANCH = "master" > meta-angstrom_REVISION = "c19c342c62416752117c2dce4696840bc864f647" > > etc. > > What do you think about that? Sounds good to me. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre