From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf6dr-0005cn-Sg for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:42:32 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2011 01:38:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,498,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="25337669" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.17.130]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2011 01:38:38 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: "Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer" Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 09:38:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-8-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; ) References: <201107071534.51372.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <4E1693CC.8080403@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E1693CC.8080403@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201107080938.37370.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bitbake.conf: update OLDEST_KERNEL to 2.6.0 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:42:32 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Friday 08 July 2011 06:21:16 Khem Raj wrote: > If oe-core never supported older kernel than 2.6.37 then setting it to > 2.6.37 would be better IMO It's not necessarily just about oe-core - it's about what layers get used on top, and some of those will be using kernels older than 2.6.37. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre