From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qrnpu-0007YF-1W for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:15:26 +0200 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Aug 2011 02:10:52 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="37110828" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.18.64]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Aug 2011 02:10:51 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:10:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; ) References: <1313078412-6872-1-git-send-email-noor_ahsan@mentor.com> <989A078976CDAD4CB2DC976EEF70E2A5068A4EA5@eu2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com> <20110812072950.GH2214@jama.jama.net> In-Reply-To: <20110812072950.GH2214@jama.jama.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201108121010.51135.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Cc: Martin Jansa Subject: Re: [PATCH] bluez4: Added new recipe version 4.96 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:15:26 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Friday 12 August 2011 08:29:50 Martin Jansa wrote: > I think that's expected with layers.. and someone will update it in > meta-oe as soon as it starts complaining.. If we're updating the version in OE-core then do we still need the one in meta-oe? What would it do that the OE-core version wouldn't? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre