From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QuMNL-0005x0-PO for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:32:32 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Aug 2011 03:27:50 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="39999898" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.18.125]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Aug 2011 03:27:49 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Phil Blundell Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:27:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; ) References: <8c4bf939c0906cd744debeb85d5d55de622c184e.1313606178.git.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <1313606497.3630.16.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> In-Reply-To: <1313606497.3630.16.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201108191127.48228.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] image.bbclass, kernel.bbclass: create warning file about deleting deploydir files X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:32:32 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wednesday 17 August 2011 19:41:37 Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:37 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > +Files in the deploy directory will not be re-created automatically if > > you +delete them. If you do delete a file, you will need to run: > > + > > + bitbake -c clean TARGET > > + bitbake TARGET > > + > > +where TARGET is the name of the appropriate package or target e.g. > > +"virtual/kernel" for the kernel, an image, etc. > > Doesn't it suffice to run "bitbake -f -c deploy TARGET"? I guess it would, but I'm not sure we really want to be encouraging users to use -f. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre