From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QvtrV-0003q3-DO for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:30:01 +0200 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Aug 2011 09:25:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="41031338" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.18.129]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Aug 2011 09:25:14 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: "Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer" Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:25:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; ) References: <4E537A0E.2040605@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E537A0E.2040605@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201108231725.13418.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: Wiki seems dead. is openembedded wiki still active? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:30:01 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tuesday 23 August 2011 10:59:42 Klausfpga wrote: > Am I using the correct url? (it's at least the url also mentioned in > wikipedia) > > Is the Wiki just temporarily down and I was just unlucky enough to try > to connect at the wromg time? Yes that's the correct link, although the website is temporarily down; the appropriate people have apparently been informed and hopefully can fix it soon. However the website/wiki can still be accessed under http://wiki.openembedded.org. > What I wanted to find out on the wiki: > > - what branch / tag to checkout to have a consitant verison I'm not quite sure what you're asking here. FYI OE is in the middle of a transition of sorts; we're moving to a more modular metadata structure based around a smaller common core (OE-Core). For more information please see this page: http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/OpenEmbedded-Core For new development work we would strongly recommend OE-core as a base, allowing you greater flexibility as well as avoiding some legacy cruft. > - what to use as starting point for a minimalist x86 system being able > to run under qemu (x86) "Minimalist" is somewhat subjective. OE-core alone provides a "qemux86" machine target, a distro-less basic configuration and a "core-image-minimal" image that provides a basic console-only system without package management. > - How to add a gnu toolchain package to my minimalist target system I think this is a case of adding "tools-sdk" to your IMAGE_FEATURES; someone else might be able to offer more help here. > - what to use as starting point for a minimalist arm11 system being able > to run under qemu (x86) Same as above except use "qemuarm" as the machine. > - what is the recommended way to run bitbake in a 64 bit environment > (psyco is not working). Is pypy an option? There's no specific recommended way; the psyco warning was just a warning and in any case if you're using a recent version of BitBake (as you need to for OE-core) then Psyco support has been removed and you won't get the warning. > - what are the correct mailing lists for such questions For OE-classic discussion as well as layers above OE-core, use the openembedded-devel mailing list. For OE-core use this list (openembedded- core). I suspect the openembedded-core list will merge into openembedded-devel at some point in the near future. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre