Re: Wiki seems dead. is openembedded wiki still active?

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Tuesday 23 August 2011 22:20:55 Klausfpga wrote:
> What I wanted to know was what to checkout best:
>  origin/master/  might not be a good idea, at least last time I tried
> this I often fell into inconsistent  releases

If you mean the "openembedded" repository, there is the 2011.03-maintenance 
branch; however this is not the basis for future development. With the Yocto 
Project release coming up soon, OE-core should be fairly stable (or at least 
heading that way).

> Well with minimalist I meant kernel + base file system + busybox +
> package management

Busybox is used by default and the rest is of course mandatory. I'm not 
entirely sure we have an image in OE-core that is just console with package 
management though; we really ought to sort that out if that's the case. Even 
so this is trivial to add, you just need "package-management" in the 
IMAGE_FEATURES for your image.

> What I meant here is: Can pypy or somethign else be used in order to
> accelerate the execution of BitBake.

Not sure; I'm under the impression that Psyco made only a very small difference 
however. Most of the time taken running BitBake is in the tasks it runs (and 
the order it runs them); no generic Python tool is going to be able to improve 
that.

Cheers,
Paul

[1] http://www.yoctoproject.org

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre