From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QwNe5-0000P4-59 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:18:09 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Aug 2011 17:13:21 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,278,1312182000"; d="scan'208";a="44135649" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.18.136]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Aug 2011 17:13:20 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Saul Wold Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:13:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; ) References: <4E558B0D.1080307@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4E558B0D.1080307@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201108250113.20066.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] qt4e-demo-image: Fix bug 999 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:18:09 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thursday 25 August 2011 00:36:45 Saul Wold wrote: > Why do we need the qt4e-base-image and this demo-image? Do we expect to > have multiple images? This creates yet another image that needs to be > built and tested? Can this really just be added to the sato-sdk or > lsb-sdk images instead? No, it doesn't belong in sato-sdk and lsb-sdk is Qt4/X11 based which counts it out also. It really needs its own image. The -base image could be merged into -demo though. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre