From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxkne-0007m7-Fv for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 21:13:42 +0200 Received: by yia28 with SMTP id 28so2740209yia.6 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:08:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0F3gqzRpinRXbwnhTneZeYOP3nC+33XUAI7wdQ9ZovE=; b=MeWRDnr4znPIhtQAhjmGGBysHJbzE560KzEB2s+t0msmAJOLXz0LlrGyf7C+GFBO9n IW670zczPb3liTec4sg7ovSNIYCPQghSAgcFNEQgTx+2hqFl5Si3QVUJ36inIS+imRKa wIZtNIcKJlZp6yhUw4GqjjLUTRhRVMhy8UX/Y= Received: by 10.236.177.65 with SMTP id c41mr20026587yhm.16.1314558530815; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vps-dorilex (vps.dorilex.net [174.143.253.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x42sm1717863yhm.23.2011.08.28.12.08.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:05:43 +0000 From: Leandro Dorileo To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Message-ID: <20110828190543.GA4498@vps-dorilex> References: <4E537A0E.2040605@gmail.com> <201108231725.13418.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201108231725.13418.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Wiki seems dead. is openembedded wiki still active? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:13:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Paul, On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 05:25:13PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 23 August 2011 10:59:42 Klausfpga wrote: > > Am I using the correct url? (it's at least the url also mentioned in > > wikipedia) > > > > Is the Wiki just temporarily down and I was just unlucky enough to try > > to connect at the wromg time? > > Yes that's the correct link, although the website is temporarily down; the > appropriate people have apparently been informed and hopefully can fix it soon. > > However the website/wiki can still be accessed under > http://wiki.openembedded.org. > > > What I wanted to find out on the wiki: > > > > - what branch / tag to checkout to have a consitant verison > > I'm not quite sure what you're asking here. > > FYI OE is in the middle of a transition of sorts; we're moving to a more > modular metadata structure based around a smaller common core (OE-Core). For > more information please see this page: The wiki frontpage could be updated stating the current OE status at least stating the transition, I`m a newcomer and took some time trying the wiki howtos. I just figured out things after I read all the mailing list archives :) > > http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/OpenEmbedded-Core > > For new development work we would strongly recommend OE-core as a base, > allowing you greater flexibility as well as avoiding some legacy cruft. This is also important to highlight somewhere, maybe the wiki front page as well. Regards, Leandro Dorileo > > > - what to use as starting point for a minimalist x86 system being able > > to run under qemu (x86) > > "Minimalist" is somewhat subjective. OE-core alone provides a "qemux86" > machine target, a distro-less basic configuration and a "core-image-minimal" > image that provides a basic console-only system without package management. > > > - How to add a gnu toolchain package to my minimalist target system > > I think this is a case of adding "tools-sdk" to your IMAGE_FEATURES; someone > else might be able to offer more help here. > > > - what to use as starting point for a minimalist arm11 system being able > > to run under qemu (x86) > > Same as above except use "qemuarm" as the machine. > > > - what is the recommended way to run bitbake in a 64 bit environment > > (psyco is not working). Is pypy an option? > > There's no specific recommended way; the psyco warning was just a warning and > in any case if you're using a recent version of BitBake (as you need to for > OE-core) then Psyco support has been removed and you won't get the warning. > > > - what are the correct mailing lists for such questions > > For OE-classic discussion as well as layers above OE-core, use the > openembedded-devel mailing list. For OE-core use this list (openembedded- > core). I suspect the openembedded-core list will merge into openembedded-devel > at some point in the near future. > > Cheers, > Paul > > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core