From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R4c6h-0001qj-KE for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:21:43 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2011 10:16:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,394,1312182000"; d="scan'208";a="54536237" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.40]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2011 10:16:29 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: "Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer" Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:16:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; ) References: <1316177653.20858.23.camel@ted> <1316191921.20858.43.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201109161816.28057.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: OE-Core release process X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:21:43 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Friday 16 September 2011 18:08:04 Otavio Salvador wrote: > More then once I wanted to pick a patch that was in poky and not yet > merged into oe-core and it wasn't that easy to split it. Can you give a specific example of this? Since the split, there have never been any patches intentionally merged into poky's OE-core parts that were not already in OE-core. (There were a few isolated occasions where some accidentally slipped in, these were rectified as soon as they were discovered.) Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre