From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R8uLC-0005vu-Sr; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:38:27 +0200 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2011 06:32:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="57540815" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.159]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2011 06:32:58 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:32:57 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; ) References: <201109281116.00890.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <4E831868.4090603@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E831868.4090603@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201109281432.57331.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: meta-micro problems X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:38:27 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wednesday 28 September 2011 13:51:52 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > If you wish, I can retry this with smaller layer set. But if the bug > will still arise, I simply have no knowledge/time to look deeper into bb > without additional input/pointers from bb gurus. That's OK, I can spend time looking into it. It sounds like a bug in bitbake if metadata can influence it to behave this way. If we can produce a simplified test case I think it will be easier to fix. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre