Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of 'all' architecture recipes and their interaction with sstate
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:12:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110930171239.GD7364@jama.jama.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317402578.12332.218.camel@ted>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1357 bytes --]

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 06:09:31PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 18:46 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:15:15PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > I'd not forgotten about this patch, just been distracted by other
> > > things. I've run some further tests on the changes here and have
> > > comments below. Summary is I think some pieces can merge, other pieces
> > > need more work. Lets try and get the pieces that are ready merged, then
> > > worry about the remainder.
> > > 
> > > Could we clean out the problematic pieces and resubmit please so we can
> > > at least get those pieces in? :)
> > 
> > pushed as 6 patches to 
> > oe-core-contrib jansa/allarch
> > 
> > 1st patch contains changes you've marked as fine
> > 2nd is hal-info, which is imho not worth debugging it as nobody likes
> >   hal nowadays (I've tried to patch configure.in, but recipe doesn't
> >   call reautoconf IIRC..)
> > the rest is kept as reminder which recipes needs to be taken care of.
> 
> Thanks. I've taken the two patches. I'd love to get rid of hal, in fact
> its on my list of things that need to migrate out of OE-Core...
> 
> I'm left wondering what (if anything) uses hal in our images?

ie xserver-xf86 before my changes..

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-30 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-30  8:19 [PATCH] Improve handling of 'all' architecture recipes and their interaction with sstate Martin Jansa
2011-09-30 14:15 ` Richard Purdie
2011-09-30 16:46   ` Martin Jansa
2011-09-30 17:09     ` Richard Purdie
2011-09-30 17:12       ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2011-10-01 18:48       ` Otavio Salvador
2011-10-04 22:00         ` Richard Purdie
2011-10-04 22:18           ` Koen Kooi
2011-10-05 12:10           ` Otavio Salvador
2011-10-05 12:22             ` Koen Kooi
2011-10-05 12:27               ` Otavio Salvador
2011-10-05 12:29                 ` Koen Kooi
2011-10-05 12:34                   ` Martin Jansa
2011-10-05 13:02                     ` Richard Purdie
2011-10-05 19:32                       ` Khem Raj
2011-10-01 18:46 ` Otavio Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110930171239.GD7364@jama.jama.net \
    --to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox