From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RLLI7-00075r-EJ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:50:39 +0100 Received: by faas16 with SMTP id s16so7687324faa.6 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:44:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=v8OlE0voLZ3k7q4Fo9VjcWxsYLSR18x1j1xC7wRCWmI=; b=tibexmHY0voBBdwN7XajvaFcooEreg4x8vlYSpS0REDjTg/3YPBj8Vq29dtDaYqEdm /ScY192bZ8yhnUFnD8e2vugiowvODPaoulQxIs3kRvXAPvoQ4J6ybfBoUYuvay2KiiM3 ck0YZYrQk9f3+hBoONgkRC3lzitrrHy6a/GSY= Received: by 10.223.63.206 with SMTP id c14mr3136605fai.3.1320180273090; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k26sm880170fab.8.2011.11.01.13.44.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 21:44:25 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Message-ID: <20111101204424.GA9949@jama.jama.net> References: <20111018183520.GB556@jama.jama.net> <20111018201708.GC556@jama.jama.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20111018201708.GC556@jama.jama.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Race condition or something when fetching local files? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:50:39 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 11761 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:17:08PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:09:43PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Martin Jansa = wrote: > > > I have noticed that even local patches are stored in downloads dir, > > > but today I've noticed that wrong file was used later in do_patch. > > > I have latest oe-core/meta-oe + latest bitbake. > > > > > > Pulseaudio was building here for first time > > > > > > downloads/buildfix.patch is from previous build of xf86-video-intel-2= =2E16.0 > > > $ head downloads/buildfix.patch > >=20 > > looking in bitbake lib/bb/fetch2/local.py it seems it searches DL_DIR > > before other >=20 > Which would be wrong for sure if I have > foo_1.0.bb with SRC_URI =3D "file://bar.patch" >=20 > foo-1.0/om-gta02/bar.patch > foo-1.0/nokia900/bar.patch >=20 > Then I don't want to use bar.patch from downloads/bar.patch where it's > from om-gta02 build when I'm building nokia900 now. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > > search paths. cleansstate might not have information that the patch > > was downloaded > > and not applied from local metadata after the recipe is updated. Reported in http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1710 --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6wWigACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBx8OACeNRARCDEEttVakM71rmYHbBsA KLkAoJMGN7hYNPtUlTsg8al2gz1fA+J1 =wi+1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--