From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ee0-f47.google.com ([74.125.83.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsetg-0008S5-DH; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:27:08 +0100 Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so361648eek.6 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:19:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=CdkEmT18gIS8eC/hQPrQjRyvME0qc9+xZ+woW1sS1DU=; b=RzfpumPXI8LTM7v2MXdi6V89CG7xV8cMWWEds8xNqz8sJQweK3ZnPggr5kYux+jn5l 33vlfJty/1N2bm9ojBSoEodOY4IhtBVrqDLmxNSRxOZqe/LODeP081mOQGxidWxuUuWq ged5N/LoLkv1JPPKbwdNnmjNFEqVF+h7WkVIY= Received: by 10.14.32.84 with SMTP id n60mr2752457eea.88.1328120352948; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:19:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a58sm22039211eeb.8.2012.02.01.10.19.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:19:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:19:09 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: Khem Raj Message-ID: <20120201181909.GC6969@jama.jama.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , bitbake-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [bitbake-devel] should we switch off patchwork for oe-core and bitbake projects X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:27:08 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 16856 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vOmOzSkFvhd7u8Ms" Content-Disposition: inline --vOmOzSkFvhd7u8Ms Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:07:14AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:51 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > wrote: > > I'm saying leave it there even if its not maintained. I can still go se= arch > > for patches sent by me or other specific people. >=20 > thats what mailing list archives are for. is there something like oe/contrib/patchwork/pw-am.sh for some mailing list archive? When I see some interesting patch in ML, easiest way for me to get it to development branch is to open patchwork web (from any computer) and then call pw-am.sh NUMBER in screen session on my development workstation. Even when reading mail in mutt on the same machine it's easier for me to use pw-am.sh to get that patch to my chroot for OE builds. And that git hook marking them as applied works very well.. so usually I just have to mark cover letters as applied. Cheers, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --vOmOzSkFvhd7u8Ms Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8pgh0ACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBwTegCgu4vNaQeFBBtnjUeCZURYOIyQ c5AAnR3vGqa0bMkfwcB4B5CbBQDhxF1l =4hmW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vOmOzSkFvhd7u8Ms--