From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vms173007pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.7]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsi1Y-0007UB-Ib; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:47:28 +0100 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.178.225.66]) by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LYQ00ACHEP5QNQ1@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net>; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:39:06 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CFC1320137; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:05 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Martin Jansa Message-id: <20120201203905.GB11070@denix.org> References: <20120201181909.GC6969@jama.jama.net> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20120201181909.GC6969@jama.jama.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , bitbake-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [bitbake-devel] should we switch off patchwork for oe-core and bitbake projects X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:47:28 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:19:09PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:07:14AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:51 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > > wrote: > > > I'm saying leave it there even if its not maintained. I can still go search > > > for patches sent by me or other specific people. > > > > thats what mailing list archives are for. > > is there something like > oe/contrib/patchwork/pw-am.sh > for some mailing list archive? > > When I see some interesting patch in ML, easiest way for me to get it to > development branch is to open patchwork web (from any computer) and then > call pw-am.sh NUMBER in screen session on my development workstation. > > Even when reading mail in mutt on the same machine it's easier for me to > use pw-am.sh to get that patch to my chroot for OE builds. > > And that git hook marking them as applied works very well.. so usually I > just have to mark cover letters as applied. I'd vote for keeping patchworks as well - there are rare patches submitted to oe-core w/o corresponding pull requests... -- Denys