From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.2]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuOkE-0000ji-Ni for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:36:35 +0100 Received: from eb-e6520 (unknown [82.240.38.71]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25404B008E for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 14:28:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 14:28:30 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20120206142830.79e73ef1@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: <1328533275.24049.16.camel@ted> References: <1328533275.24049.16.camel@ted> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Performance numbers X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:36:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Richard, Le Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:01:15 +0000, Richard Purdie a =E9crit : > Its been a while since we had some performance numbers and there were > recently some questions about how current build time compared to > previous numbers. >=20 > On my 12 core system, build time for qemux86 from scratch is ~42 > minutes. This compares favourably with previous numbers from that > system. Interestingly, switching to qemumips resulted in a build time of > 43 minutes in the same tmpdir suggesting that the native part of the > bootstrap process isn't the bottleneck. >=20 > On the quad core (the system used for many of the previous numbers I'd > provided), build time for qemux86 was 105 minutes which again is roughly > consistent with where things were for 1.1. >=20 what are your settings (PARALLEL_MAKE & BB_NUMBER_THREADS) used in both cases ? Thanks Eric --=20 http://eukrea.com/en/news/104-2012