From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIPu3-00008C-3X for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:41:59 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.178.225.66]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M2D0006ZQ4ZF480@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:31:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC32C20099; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:31:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:31:47 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Message-id: <20120412183147.GD13291@denix.org> References: <7E680CB2A76BB8438D08CF13C09FC53A46B06325@FMSMSX151.amr.corp.intel.com> <4F84D58F.8020608@gmail.com> <1334221321.31685.24.camel@ted> <4543FDF1-0512-4B36-ABB3-DBB957B86E88@dominion.thruhere.net> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Yocto Project 1.2 M4 schedule X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:41:59 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:32:00PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 14:22, Koen Kooi wrote: > > You just volunteered to handle all the "Does it work with yocto 1.2?" questions :) > > > > Simply put: people are stupid, they need explicit PHB compliant names in tags, even if it isn't 100% politically correct to say "yocto" when we actually mean "oe-core". > > > > Unless the yocto 1.2 release note state that it's based on oe-core "foo" and all layers compatible with "foo" use "foo" in tags/branches. > > I think layers ought to have tags for both ... > > -oe-core- > -yocto- And -poky- for completeness? Seriously, "yocto"-naming schema is not that bad. For shortness, it can be "yp-1.2" as a suffix to the layer-specific tags... But I'm flexible with other naming schemas, such as "YYYY.MM" or "YYYY.#" -- Denys