From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ee0-f47.google.com ([74.125.83.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SK9aC-00015J-4q for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:40:40 +0200 Received: by eekc1 with SMTP id c1so1340271eek.6 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:31:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MS2I/kohuNheuVRJ7m9OWGlb7flVJFEx7zCy0Sg3cls=; b=TjhOc8joj+XPM3RCWlpzaiMh8S3zlsKFVABVhkZhiO+zgURqqx4+RMYfeT03G13Xs+ 4OhUQMZNcxzd38QziAY9jURlesQ07zqCI3GKntKQVN553BFZpVKVNNw1BDKpeUMHzRQS za/Mb6b6MCaMaGJQIPQc23iU+7Vk+NfP4+5GjghgMwXLdLnZCuMV0AydZTIVwjp53Icg hQ3TThElSsV1xt4ZKPsjcLVv2jtDMpMQHZL/uarQ/ivNVOKcdSzml6Hc7JhsWCnOla6J HIbyqRFk/fvN1gYWHCyDXEs1kKOzRSAAJPEW3CxXtbsUyVF67NoXfx824lwEOkklJgfm PDVA== Received: by 10.14.119.137 with SMTP id n9mr2367393eeh.69.1334673074175; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n55sm103208863eef.6.2012.04.17.07.31.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:31:12 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Message-ID: <20120417143112.GD3665@jama.jama.net> References: <1332471418-31459-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <1332504325.9740.395.camel@ted> <20120323131701.GF3879@jama.jama.net> <20120324022639.GF4604@jama.jama.net> <20120328143347.GF4004@jama.jama.net> <20120404211108.GJ4181@jama.jama.net> <20120416143310.GH11086@jama.jama.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120416143310.GH11086@jama.jama.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: eglibc: shlib.lds:127: syntax error Was: [PATCH 1/2] eglibc-2.15: Update SRCREV X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:40:40 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 20888 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tNQTSEo8WG/FKZ8E" Content-Disposition: inline --tNQTSEo8WG/FKZ8E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:33:10PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:11:08PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:33:47PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 07:15:32AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 02:17:02PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:05:25PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > >> > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 19:56 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > >> > > Get new patches and remove the one that got merged upstream > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > > > >> > > --- > > > > >> > > =A0.../eglibc/eglibc-2.15/GLRO_dl_debug_mask.patch =A0 =A0| = =A0108 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > >> > > =A0.../eglibc-2.15/armv4-eabi-compile-fix.patch =A0 =A0 =A0 = | =A0 25 ----- > > > > >> > > =A0.../eglibc/eglibc-2.15/initgroups_keys.patch =A0 =A0 =A0 = | =A0 20 ++++ > > > > >> > > =A0meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.15.bb =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0| =A0 =A05 +- > > > > >> > > =A04 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > >> > > =A0create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.15/G= LRO_dl_debug_mask.patch > > > > >> > > =A0delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.15/a= rmv4-eabi-compile-fix.patch > > > > >> > > =A0create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.15/i= nitgroups_keys.patch > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Since 2.15 isn't the default I'm tempted to merge this despite= the point > > > > >> > we're at in the release cycle. I'd like to give anyone using t= his the > > > > >> > opportunity to comment first though. > > > > >> > > > > >> I'm testing this on all archs I'm using (armv4t, armv5te, armv7a, > > > > >> x86-64) and will report tomorrow. > > > > > > > > > > Doesn't look related to this change, but I got interesing error o= n other > > > > > buildhost (on mine everything seems fine sofar including tests on > > > > > target), I don't have log from armv4t build on mine, because it's= on tmpfs > > > > > and there was unexpected reboot when I wasn't home :/. > > > >=20 > > > > Hi Martin > > > >=20 > > > > Does it look good for your testing ? > > >=20 > > > Seems fine in runtime any hint about that build issue? > > >=20 > > > Today I got another one :/ > > >=20 > > > "build-x86_64-oe-linux/shlib.lds:127: syntax error > > > while building eglibc > > >=20 > > > I had reports about this before, but wasn't able to reproduce it on my > > > machine, today I got it for first time (maybe because of building with > > > -j8 instead of -j4), so I've created simple testcase to compare inter= im=20 > > > outputs from shlib.lds creation: > > > http://build.shr-project.org/tests/jama/shlib-issue/ > >=20 > > To follow this monolog, the problem is in file Makerules itself, gcc > > output is the same as well as output from sed, but Makerules file is > > partially rewritten during build and if shlib.lds gets generated in > > wrong time then it results in this > >=20 > > touch /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv4t-oe-linux-gnueabi/eglibc/eglib= c-2.15-r3+svnr17386/eglibc-2_15/libc/Makerules > >=20 > > after eglibc build fail is enough to recreate correct shlibs.lds >=20 > I was running core-image-minimal builds on different block devices to > provide some build time data for=20 > [yocto] Build time data > thread and it seems that this bug is more likely to happen on fast host > with slow IO >=20 > I've got it 4 times today (from 4 tries) when running with tmpdir on RAID= 5, > and only once (from 3 tries) when running with with tmpdir on tmpfs. Today I got it 6 times when trying to build on single SATA2 disk.. filled https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2314 Cheers, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --tNQTSEo8WG/FKZ8E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+NfrAACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBz/jgCfSRYWfIqLkMI+rC10llhVDcMR aCUAnjCCThOgQHlzkjk76w/Nht/sFKcy =OGDX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tNQTSEo8WG/FKZ8E--