From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmREW-0006Ih-OQ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:11:13 +0200 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q64F07jq013294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yow-pgortmak-d1 (128.224.146.65) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.255.0; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:00:06 -0700 Received: from paul by yow-pgortmak-d1 with local (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1SmR3l-0000cg-Gh; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 11:00:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:00:05 -0400 From: Paul Gortmaker To: Saul Wold Message-ID: <20120704150005.GD1817@windriver.com> References: <4FF0C930.4000104@linux.intel.com> <1341207885-9463-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <4FF33085.1070703@linux.intel.com> <20120704141259.GA1817@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120704141259.GA1817@windriver.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] u-boot recipe updates X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 15:11:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline [Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] u-boot recipe updates] On 04/07/2012 (Wed 10:12) Paul Gortmaker wrote: > [Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] u-boot recipe updates] On 03/07/2012 (Tue 10:48) Saul Wold wrote: > > > On 07/01/2012 10:44 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > >These are the oe-core updates required so that yocto can do > > >a successful build of a working u-boot image for the mpc8315 > > >reference BSP. > > > > > >In v2, I've fixed up the issue where TARGET_PREFIX accidentally became > > >specific to the one single recipe. That made the 3/3 patch in v1 no > > >longer required. However, when build testing, I noticed that we > > >were needlessly clobbering PARALLEL_MAKE for u-boot, which is not > > >at all required, and just slows down builds. So a new patch is > > >added to fix that, and we still have three total. > > > > > >I've built for the beagleboard with -j8 (twice), and the same for > > >the 8315 BSP. I've also always built u-boot with -j10 or greater > > >for countless powerpc images I've made in the last 1/2 dozen years. > > >Looking at the git history, it appears this just came in with some > > >large import, versus being an actively chosen individual setting. > > > > > >The 8315 specific patch that was sent to the yocto list earlier to > > >enable building it (u-boot.bin) by default is unchanged, but I can > > >resend that if it helps somehow. > > > > > >Paul. > > >--- > > > > > >Paul Gortmaker (3): > > > u-boot: Don't make the -Os removal part of global settings. > > > u-boot: make FILESDIR a shared setting. > > > u-boot: do not clobber PARALLEL_MAKE setting > > > > > Took in patches 1 & 3 into OE-Core > > Thanks! > > > > > Looking for an update for FILESDIR -> FILESPATH as suggested by Richard. > > I've not seen Richard's feedback, since I'm OOO, and with the To/Cc: > stripped, it has got archived vs. staying in my inbox. [They get > archived, because just like LKML, I'm not going to pretend I can read > all poky/oe mail on the very day it arrives.] I've found Richard's comments [looking in OE archive and not poky helped] and will test what he proposed to replace FILESDIR. But I still think it extremely worthwhile if some fine tuning to the mailing list(s) can be done to address what I mentioned below. Thanks, Paul. -- > > On a related note, is it possible to fix the mailing list so that it > does not strip To/Cc information and Message-ID strings? [I'd have to > check -- maybe it is (also) inserting a needless Reply-To: header that > messes things up.] > > Further, without a proper Message-ID, it breaks patchworks, so Richard's > comments should be here: > > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/30879/ > > but unfortunately they are not. The netdev and ppc dev lists for linux > use patchworks and have the follow-up review comments captured and it is > really quite useful to all (esp. the person who has to triage and > decruftify patchworks content/state once a month...) > > Finally, I can't even find it in the June/July archives: > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2012-July/subject.html > > Just thought it worth a mention, in case it hasn't been mentioned > before. Fixing these little quirks would lower the barrier to entry > and the frustration factor for new contributors. If I can help out > somehow with testing a fix, let me know. > > Thanks, > Paul. > -- > > > > > Thanks > > Sau! > > > > > > > meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc | 6 ++---- > > > meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2011.03.bb | 2 -- > > > meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2011.06.bb | 2 -- > > > meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2012.04.01.bb | 2 -- > > > 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > >