From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SujbT-0004Ke-S3 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:25:11 +0200 Received: by weyr6 with SMTP id r6so1843662wey.6 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 05:13:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PmKpfgg9wkB+7PTdVt6VcLeEgEIsStWG+zI/MbL0SLM=; b=MzHdV0ZuTHEUttlMP5vyCd/KdgkuBSVZOE0NFH4JFF2gOPykowkQqsvsU74Lc0Khr/ wscwSJPC9uCFrLij3hD9MTJ+wBqwZ0g50hAgKL+ZQz+WaBFpH03IO2Cl5rRzbjyEoFQw h794AcGmO4GWWSWPwppNoQllpzmAxCD4L+ln6SEQUsCqbs5NtGB+vFS5Gyw5sA8yz26G 8ZoozzI1+ZoXH6bQDQGDThifRGVV4uyz9z6FZlRGF39iAxIKVVtD7Z+LswAgfPvxOubL h/SiP+NqpSfLVAqaZVRPz1yQKEB4/Pf50ouWkenh9SicaqasthyRaifp6E8o6HCDmP5Y n0OA== Received: by 10.180.86.133 with SMTP id p5mr5667963wiz.17.1343391220054; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 05:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t7sm6084075wix.6.2012.07.27.05.13.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 05:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:13:44 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Message-ID: <20120727121344.GL3621@jama.jama.net> References: <20120726135324.6971710217@opal> <20120727110521.GH3621@jama.jama.net> <20120727115256.GK3621@jama.jama.net> <1343390744.5878.101.camel@phil-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1343390744.5878.101.camel@phil-desktop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [oe-commits] Cristian Iorga : libpcap: upgrade to ver. 1.3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:25:11 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 26390 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sCNd3Ivk/oijKKf1" Content-Disposition: inline --sCNd3Ivk/oijKKf1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:05:43PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 13:52 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > * check_data_file_clashes: Package libpcap1 wants to install file /usr= /lib/libpcap.so.1 > > But that file is already provided by package * libpcap > > * check_data_file_clashes: Package libpcap1 wants to install file /usr= /lib/libpcap.so.1 > > But that file is already provided by package * libpcap >=20 > If the old library was also libpcap.so.1, why has the package name > changed? You said in your first mail that the patch "changes .so > version" but if that was the case then there oughtn't to have been a > file conflict here. True, I haven't seen this error before sending my first reply. So I've assumed that it was libpcap0 before and I was wrong.=20 The real reason for package rename was that before this upgrade libpcap=20 package contained also pcap-config (so debian naming wasn't used): http://git.shr-project.org/git/?p=3Dbuildhistory.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3D85d= ae3abafee082905ffb5b9f1a2072e8f3eb047#patch190 Once again https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2787 proves to be usefull.. Cheers, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --sCNd3Ivk/oijKKf1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAShfgACgkQN1Ujt2V2gByUUQCfTBZCfwQozPHD+iLRGJoBPj3o wJcAnRpYSdCZ31C90W9wo7cXlhyE2Sro =aZfZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sCNd3Ivk/oijKKf1--