From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sxkdy-000692-55 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 22:08:14 +0200 Received: by weyr6 with SMTP id r6so1066965wey.6 for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 12:56:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Wyaw5W4KP8qpzGetT/PieZX4ThZqaXG+zETVUHFto1Q=; b=d7+Ox3z7DE8HGNuGlqSXafIpmu3Liu5BqMAYhEAxDgxd/Bgo3IWHtmuUKldi3bFtkr 2iJ32KcgHYLZAUQXDWbANK8rDMpPO2rb6kmj8yhAxq6OITVaAkkOq2GWJnmsgObCF855 D2U+RHeiskIxWkM0rV4NqvjFkLRttjLj2B/MBO3sjqDgt65kr80dJiaTGCNCKlJBW30M fKk5YoqT9rqI1/Jr/NQiRm5QifckT+iOu6Mew99y+JU2BN5PN2aJ9plO3HGe2lOJEQH0 qFRGu1Vlnq/QzrrpkD+563J5G84K8r5gLKdgzmuCkybPyAfTIy9U2cOhV+6yLcNzV0l4 dFyA== Received: by 10.180.20.11 with SMTP id j11mr6152209wie.12.1344110191724; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 12:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ef5sm7768545wib.3.2012.08.04.12.56.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 04 Aug 2012 12:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 21:56:25 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Message-ID: <20120804195625.GA3267@jama.jama.net> References: <501CD3EE.3080100@intel.com> <501D2B2B.6070806@intel.com> <3103BB42-D7DD-456B-8733-9A019CA66E99@dominion.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gtk-icon-cache: call postinst scriplet at do_rootfs time X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 20:08:14 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 26911 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 12:51:47PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Andreas M=FCller > wrote: > > And less than 3min on overo with the patches we sent (and my xfce > > image is full of gtk-icon-update). Don't misunderstand me: I agree on > > doing things like this on host if possible. But for me the main time > > waiting on a new image is do_rootfs and I just suggest to think about > > having these tasks run only once - but we can do this later or never. > > A bit off topic: As far as I can remember there were times when it was > > a no-go having gtk-native in oe-core. I hope they are over... >=20 > I certainly agree with you that it should be run once. However what if > you changed something in icons between towo do rootfs runs ? > but I would like to know how much build time is it adding to do_rootfs ? > sometimes over optimising is bad too. I think Andreas patch does run it once *per* do_rootfs, so not for every package which uses it if there is at least one installed in do_rootfs then it's executed once. --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAdfmkACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBxiiwCdFkG99JuFWvg9BRIT8H2uFMNd MyMAn325ZV4PLFW+Zwk1ZDlC86WGWrZ7 =rWc1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj--