From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz5gZ-0003MJ-QZ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:48:27 +0200 Received: by weyr6 with SMTP id r6so396065wey.6 for ; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 05:36:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Wx2gL1SMx7OowsVMTjxdu+e6d2b/m/kP9eTqIuPBDzk=; b=sP5gC2R2H/xICeaT5fIQbPHUvUiCxFrhOY+mfJetFdqcdVt2YvvH5LXrnqMdayUWrt I5gb9u0RtHXwunHjKe6U5MNb5x3FnOhqFz+I33kiFBaJrNoCwAVyfRN597YDyPyR3R+b +J+IpVkTvoeYPCiVvS9XyA3703pgFAtXns7LrEs1MuleVZABuKfZPbtXPPuhBKyjRfH0 qk9XWJ/To+qQmwiHgApMOWlxyWMhKC+tULVz6vJ6dTRH45+Oextdhtqskecr0D8xBuJ5 lFyJMo8zip2rHtpE/tOk51B3fieG6sYksYK65QJcqe+IbZ4Fd22mCir+pStw92djRLP0 68/w== Received: by 10.180.91.1 with SMTP id ca1mr2413294wib.8.1344429400738; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 05:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eu4sm4937330wib.2.2012.08.08.05.36.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 08 Aug 2012 05:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:36:37 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Message-ID: <20120808123637.GA2854@jama.jama.net> References: <5995DE95-9135-4B8E-82BA-F0938B2D755F@dominion.thruhere.net> <1344428588.9756.333.camel@ted> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1344428588.9756.333.camel@ted> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Replacing Web in Sato with Midori X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:48:27 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 27179 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:23:08PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 12:01 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 8 aug. 2012, om 10:41 heeft "Burton, Ross" h= et volgende geschreven: > >=20 > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > As everyone who's used it can attest, Web (the optional browser in > > > Sato) is pretty rough. Part of my plans about replacing Sato with a > > > leaner environment involves replacing it with Midori, and if there > > > isn't any disagreements I'll work on a submission to merge Midori into > > > Sato now for everyone who expects the Sato web browser to be useful. > > >=20 > > > This will involve pulling a few projects from meta-oe to oe-core: > > > ca-certificates, python-docutils and vala specifically (although its > > > possible that we can drop the vala dependency). > >=20 > > Adding more stuff to oe-core is a bad idea. You should take this > > opportunity to split all the sato stuff into its own layer. >=20 > I feel very strongly that having a core layer with no way of > demonstrating and testing it is a very bad idea. I haven't changed my > mind about this and am very unlikely to. "How do you know it works?" is > the question you ask about package upgrades for example. And does it need to be in the same layer? Why not test webkit-gtk from oe-core with midori from meta-oe layer?=20 Or meta-browser layer if meta-oe is too big for testing webkit-gtk. Cheers, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAiXVUACgkQN1Ujt2V2gByXdgCeL/3+GDfafNdiZk39KH1HDn0f zpgAoJBZuEds0DYLkfCuH88rVoJXLEKl =uZMI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--