From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.66]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1HqP-0005wA-3A for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:11:41 +0200 Received: from relay1.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.67]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1T1Heu-0001H2-BL>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:59:48 +0200 Received: from andorra.imp.fu-berlin.de ([160.45.42.84]) by relay1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1T1Heu-0007M0-8A>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:59:48 +0200 Received: from heinold by internal andorra.imp.fu-berlin.de with local (Exim 4.72) id 1T1Het-0001mg-5R for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:59:47 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:59:47 +0200 From: Henning Heinold To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Message-ID: <20120814135946.GA5597@mi.fu-berlin.de> References: <502A3A26.5090008@mlbassoc.com> <1344944787.23275.384.camel@phil-desktop> <502A3C00.6010609@mlbassoc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <502A3C00.6010609@mlbassoc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: Henning Heinold X-Originating-IP: 160.45.42.84 Subject: Re: wpa-supplicant & EAP-TLS X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:11:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:52:32AM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-08-14 05:46, Phil Blundell wrote: > >On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 05:44 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > >>Does anyone know why the recipe for wpa_supplicant is using gnutls > >>and not the default OpenSSH for TLS services? It seems that gnutls > >>is somehow broken and EAP-TLS does not work with this configuration. > >>Changing wpa_supplicant to use the OpenSSH libraries makes EAP-TLS > >>work fine. > >> > >>Would a patch to make this change be entertained? or should I just > >>keep it in my own layer? > > > >I don't think a patch to just flip the default would be a good idea. A > >patch to make it be a DISTRO_FEATURE, on the other hand, would be > >excellent. > > Thanks, I'll see about working one up. Btw. You mean openssl not openssh, which uses openssl too. And a problem with using openssl for wpa_supplicant was license incompatibilities. Mabyee it is fixed meanwhile. Bye Henning