Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove older GTK+ versions
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:39:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120817123916.GJ3625@jama.jama.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3890692.qcbBpDRmfO@helios>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1326 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 01:32:59PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 17 August 2012 14:30:17 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 01:27:20PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Friday 17 August 2012 12:35:07 Ross Burton wrote:
> > > > If someone still wants to use them, meta-oe is a better place for them
> > > > to
> > > > live.
> > > 
> > > As a general note, personally I'd rather that no more alternative versions
> > > of anything be added to meta-oe.
> > 
> > Yes especially with DEFAULT_PREFERRENCE not working between layers.. so
> > everyone with meta-oe and without P_V set, would get this old version..
> 
> The best plan it would seem to me would be to have a separate meta-archive or 
> meta-attic or similar named layer for these older recipes, and set its layer 
> priority to the same as OE-Core.

Should I file a but to fix DEFAULT_PREFERENCE between layers? 

Because there is also use case when newer development version is added 
to e.g. meta-oe with negative D_P and only users who decide to test/use
that version should get it, if they define P_V for this new version.

Currently it would became default version for all meta-oe users without
P_V specified, which isn't very intuitive.

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-17 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-17 11:35 [PATCH 0/2] Remove older GTK+ versions Ross Burton
2012-08-17 11:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] gtk+: remove 2.12.7 Ross Burton
2012-08-17 11:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] gtk+ remove 2.16.6 Ross Burton
2012-08-17 12:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] Remove older GTK+ versions Richard Purdie
2012-08-17 12:27 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-17 12:30   ` Martin Jansa
2012-08-17 12:32     ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-17 12:39       ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2012-08-17 12:48         ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-17 12:54           ` Martin Jansa
2012-08-17 12:56             ` Martin Jansa
2012-08-17 13:08             ` Paul Eggleton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120817123916.GJ3625@jama.jama.net \
    --to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox