From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove older GTK+ versions
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:39:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120817123916.GJ3625@jama.jama.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3890692.qcbBpDRmfO@helios>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1326 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 01:32:59PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 17 August 2012 14:30:17 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 01:27:20PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Friday 17 August 2012 12:35:07 Ross Burton wrote:
> > > > If someone still wants to use them, meta-oe is a better place for them
> > > > to
> > > > live.
> > >
> > > As a general note, personally I'd rather that no more alternative versions
> > > of anything be added to meta-oe.
> >
> > Yes especially with DEFAULT_PREFERRENCE not working between layers.. so
> > everyone with meta-oe and without P_V set, would get this old version..
>
> The best plan it would seem to me would be to have a separate meta-archive or
> meta-attic or similar named layer for these older recipes, and set its layer
> priority to the same as OE-Core.
Should I file a but to fix DEFAULT_PREFERENCE between layers?
Because there is also use case when newer development version is added
to e.g. meta-oe with negative D_P and only users who decide to test/use
that version should get it, if they define P_V for this new version.
Currently it would became default version for all meta-oe users without
P_V specified, which isn't very intuitive.
Cheers,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-17 11:35 [PATCH 0/2] Remove older GTK+ versions Ross Burton
2012-08-17 11:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] gtk+: remove 2.12.7 Ross Burton
2012-08-17 11:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] gtk+ remove 2.16.6 Ross Burton
2012-08-17 12:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] Remove older GTK+ versions Richard Purdie
2012-08-17 12:27 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-17 12:30 ` Martin Jansa
2012-08-17 12:32 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-17 12:39 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2012-08-17 12:48 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-17 12:54 ` Martin Jansa
2012-08-17 12:56 ` Martin Jansa
2012-08-17 13:08 ` Paul Eggleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120817123916.GJ3625@jama.jama.net \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox