From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.141]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJktH-0006Tx-6j for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:50:59 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=887; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1349354280; x=1350563880; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=NvlQQVvMQkdaMk+37hAa4Bn7LSwgltXNNXTa70HevXI=; b=H9SrfWswutS6wKJkY7QwVhSE0vzRQSe41DWGA78qW6GeSO2Y/uRqBHzx 4Ii+V8ImqucUfvq2uh7DdIB1IldizaNV12I5nYnZzRtwyWi3dKJIYxZ04 KUtSADif8Qx87w6t+Kt3d/SZ1vOfyw4s3CmN01/kCQgK83m5ysTnpnltu Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuwNAIeBbVCQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABFhUhHt2wCAgIBgQiBCIIgAQEBBBIBEFYQCxcBAgImAgIUOw4TIodjmH+NG5JvBIEhjwwyYAOVaAGOQoFpgm8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,535,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="77179204" Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Oct 2012 12:36:54 +0000 Received: from kattastrofe (dhcp-10-54-74-65.cisco.com [10.54.74.65]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q94Cas30000930 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:36:54 GMT Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:36:54 +0200 From: Morten Minde Neergaard To: Phil Blundell Message-ID: <20121004123654.GB26670@cisco.com> References: <1349352468.32611.164.camel@phil-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1349352468.32611.164.camel@phil-desktop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Only one copy of bitbake should be run against a build directory X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:50:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline At 13:07, Thu 2012-10-04, Phil Blundell wrote: > Since updating my copy of bitbake to one which does this extra locking, > I've come to realise that the constraint of having only one copy of > bitbake running is a bit of a nuisance when making use of devshells. In Message-ID: <20120924074452.GH2254@kattastrofe.rd.tandberg.com>, Subject: [OE-core] Customize devshell terminal command / environment, I suggested the patch found in https://gist.github.com/3774736 This patch would allow you to customize the terminal used, including spawning a terminal that detaches itself from the bitbake. So, my setup is: patch plus bitbake running in a screen instance plus these settings: OE_TERMINAL = "custom" OE_TERMINAL_CUSTOMCMD = "screen" OE_TERMINAL_EXPORTS += "STY" (Should I submit this (non-obtrusive) patch somewhere? (-: ) Smiles, -- Morten Minde Neergaard