From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOOJ6-00036r-Oi for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:44:49 +0200 Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hq4so231922wib.0 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:31:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=t0iwesRuQzDsLyLa8+MYCKWCj78dZ3q7ThIYgnF2Jc4=; b=FLYR/10J8W7KSWDO+GZdozhRO98B5ffyCqdlhJMV2/WjP9gXFh1gI6eP5Uk1vROtQr d969BnwNZdY71Su+S+tRs/5bCuId8LlTPMWVYK1BEmJwBYXzP0jsRs5UgDylu6Ain8Bk 2KqCru8/D/sohFke9FfH/vL3XUBQhSTl+oVdksY0izf3oswV+5cCRWru9di5V0b5b+2P hBDYZ5IPgdKBAoJlHg4JwixDw7oPZnKOdKsoc1TrANFKTmu6EGhL+wYX55xBRWI4Nfb6 /aHg9JNL6BODsnNzxf8fCGheRU1FC45Ex/4nkwv2qxKlrOWbVDkmy06em2Jufqzda90M /e8A== Received: by 10.180.99.133 with SMTP id eq5mr2005096wib.21.1350459091037; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:31:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gm7sm26200518wib.10.2012.10.17.00.31.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:31:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:31:36 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Patrick Turley Message-ID: <20121017073136.GF3405@jama.jama.net> References: <1350424046-18863-1-git-send-email-ferlandm@sonatest.com> <1350424046-18863-2-git-send-email-ferlandm@sonatest.com> <20121016223739.GB3405@jama.jama.net> <71077863.US7FUzvX2E@helios> <242F788A-5F02-496B-B9DF-F8F3B0633992@gamestop.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <242F788A-5F02-496B-B9DF-F8F3B0633992@gamestop.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Paul Eggleton , "" Subject: Re: [PATCH] lmsensors: Initial commit. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:44:49 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 30618 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SxgehGEc6vB0cZwN" Content-Disposition: inline --SxgehGEc6vB0cZwN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:29:21AM +0000, Patrick Turley wrote: > On Oct 16, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >=20 > > On Wednesday 17 October 2012 00:37:39 Martin Jansa wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 05:47:26PM -0400, Marc Ferland wrote: > >>> Adds the lm_sensors applications. These consists of: > >> Is it really needed in oe-core? why not meta-oe? > >=20 > > I'm thinking meta-oe is the place for this. As a bonus, rrdtool is alre= ady=20 > > there. >=20 > I am not qualified to have an opinion either way - but I *am* curious abo= ut the motivating rationale. What are the reasons that this should appear i= n meta-oe? oe-core as *core* for other layers, should have only the most important metadata which are needed for all other layers, like toolchain etc. A lot of embedded images does not include or need lmsensors, so it's kind of extra package which does not need to be included in *core*. Cheers, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --SxgehGEc6vB0cZwN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlB+XtgACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBw2dgCcDVpBPWJtjD6CvTr1WKgxuTx4 /j0AoJT/oxs19gHZnYXGlrR4u9Ctu/1h =hQgh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SxgehGEc6vB0cZwN--