From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ee0-f47.google.com ([74.125.83.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Td3Tc-00067T-9A for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 19:32:19 +0100 Received: by mail-ee0-f47.google.com with SMTP id l10so6267521eei.6 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:18:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QvLvTAmmnjYDtTmpp1aYp5jbuhC4/zsW5zYkTtCNQ48=; b=oOuIPRQCCWFuKnVBeNzjGfxhlHG+ltH3uOs/UzC6/U26g3ahHWUcgKQb55vzZToRAd uUJaDUkafvglJRaDW2OUyVNhY14yLmXoDoTCkZtyWNBl7+j3le1j+H+jtXUz82jadWiA Jr+AOSltluMR5RuaVm9TPZYYQC0stsgEiKeWicP0FNNMmJ9S61D/mAG6dgXKWl/QbTTA 18I4duzYzGDhxe0HntiIYq8C0UFdmI7Q0SRcaKdDDVnCazIuFwvbBIzkHvQiYF2rJIrO 4zE6M7O6k+7HxpIV93giNd0Nrkk674leW8kpcg5+e66uHScyE79Arixsbbf3NRbKLxvB 7bjQ== Received: by 10.14.173.65 with SMTP id u41mr2466373eel.13.1353953884406; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:18:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a44sm35548145eeo.7.2012.11.26.10.18.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:18:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 19:18:10 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: Phil Blundell Message-ID: <20121126181810.GA18943@jama.jama.net> References: <1348318001-18232-1-git-send-email-Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> <1353933452-13251-1-git-send-email-Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> <20121126135758.GB3401@jama.jama.net> <1353942076.13864.742.camel@phil-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1353942076.13864.742.camel@phil-desktop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: use the same versioning schema for modules.tgz and provide link to latest X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:32:19 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 31764 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:01:15PM +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 14:57 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > I remember seeing some thread about making whole modules tarball > > creation optional and disabled by default, so I guess there is only a > > few users of this. >=20 > That particular patch was apparently rejected, but I think you're right > that only one or two people said at the time that they were using the > tarball. It does seem to be a slightly fringe interest. http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/37087/ Was it really rejected? I take RP's comment as rejecting setting KERNEL_DEPLOY_MODULE_TARBALL to 0 as default, but not as rejecting whole patch.. Cheers, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlCzsmIACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBy5kACeNO6h0bpPiyRmeKZChs9BLX2Y eNgAn1VxgseGMhAoldkdBwqSB1cZKGxm =RD3w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--