From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: slightly confused about .bbappend file and FILESPATH
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:57:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121212045736.GA23338@jama.jama.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1212111424130.29254@oneiric>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8851 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 02:39:16PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:19:57PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Mark Hatle wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 12/6/12 12:03 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > currently writing a tutorial page on how .bbappend files and
> > > > > FILESPATH work, and i wanted to use a live example, but now i'm
> > > > > confused.
> > > >
> > > > The way it works is the same way as PATH in the shell. It's just a set of
> > > > search paths.
> > > >
> > > > > using meta-ti layer, i chose to build core-image-minimal for a
> > > > > beagleboard, for which the meta-ti layer has the following under
> > > > > recipes-core/netbase/ that i want to use as an example:
> > > > >
> > > > > $ find
> > > > > .
> > > > > ./netbase_5.0.bbappend
> > > > > ./netbase-5.0
> > > > > ./netbase-5.0/beagleboard
> > > > > ./netbase-5.0/beagleboard/interfaces
> > > > > $
> > > > >
> > > > > where the .bbappend file contains only:
> > > > >
> > > > > THISDIR := "${@os.path.dirname(bb.data.getVar('FILE', d, True))}"
> > > >
> > > > I believe this is the default value of 'THISDIR' already, so there is no
> > > > reason to specify it in the .bbappend itself.
> > > >
> > > > > FILESPATH =. "${@base_set_filespath(["${THISDIR}/${PN}"], d)}:"
> > > >
> > > > In this example, it's incorrect. As you have a directory named
> > > > "netbase-5.0", so your FILESPATH should be: ${THISDIR}/${PN}-${PV}
> > >
> > > ok, so that's just a bug in the setting of FILESPATH in that one
> > > example? whew. i was seriously wondering how badly i misunderstood
> > > how this feature worked.
> > >
> > > as soon as my beagle core-image-minimal finishes building, i should
> > > be able to trivially check that the interfaces file used to populate
> > > the rootfs image is the one from oe-core and not the one that should
> > > have come from meta-ti.
> >
> > See FILESEXTRAPATHS in other bbappends and
> >
> > meta/classes/base.bbclass:FILESPATH = "${@base_set_filespath(["${FILE_DIRNAME}/${BP}","${FILE_DIRNAME}/${BPN}", "${FILE_DIRNAME}/files"], d)}"
> >
> > + definition of fce base_set_filespath:
> > meta/classes/utils.bbclass:def base_set_filespath(path, d):
>
> i'm still not sure what your point is here.
That all you need is 1 line:
FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${BP}:"
> to be perfectly clear,
> if i'm pulling in the meta-ti layer and building a core-image-minimal
> for a beagleboard, it appears that the overriding network interfaces
> file from the meta-ti layer does *not* override the one from oe-core
> since this is the full value of FILESPATH being used:
>
> # FILESPATH="${@base_set_filespath(["${THISDIR}/${PN}"], d)}
> ${@base_set_filespath(["${FILE_DIRNAME}/${BP}", "${FILE_DIRNAME}/${BPN}", "${FILE_DIRNAME}/files"], d)}"
> FILESPATH="/home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/linux-gnueabi
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/arm
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/build-linux
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/pn-netbase
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/dm814x-evm
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/ti814x
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/armv7a
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/class-target
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/forcevariable
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/libc-glibc
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/linux-gnueabi
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/arm
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/build-linux
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/pn-netbase
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/dm814x-evm
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/ti814x
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/armv7a
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/class-target
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/forcevariable
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/libc-glibc
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-5.0/
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/linux-gnueabi
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/arm
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/build-linux
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/pn-netbase
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/dm814x-evm
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/ti814x
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/armv7a
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/class-target
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/forcevariable
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/libc-glibc
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase/
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/linux-gnueabi
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/arm
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/build-linux
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/pn-netbase
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/dm814x-evm
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/ti814x
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/armv7a
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/class-target
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/forcevariable
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/libc-glibc
> /home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-core/netbase/files/"
>
> note that the directories from the meta-ti layer don't include the
> (correct) value of netbase/netbase-5.0, since (as i understand it) the
> line in base.bbclass you refer to:
>
> FILESPATH = "${@base_set_filespath(["${FILE_DIRNAME}/${BP}", \
> "${FILE_DIRNAME}/${BPN}", "${FILE_DIRNAME}/files"], d)}"
>
> only causes the expansion into the common variants of the directory
> name for the oe-core layer (as you can see above). so under oe-core,
> you'll get the automatic directory name variants netbase, netbase-5.0
> and files (exactly what you see above).
>
> but under the meta-ti layer for netbase, you *don't* get that since
> here's the netbase_5.0.bbappend file:
>
> THISDIR := "${@os.path.dirname(bb.data.getVar('FILE', d, True))}"
> FILESPATH =. "${@base_set_filespath(["${THISDIR}/${PN}"], d)}:"
>
> which (unless i'm cripplingly mistaken) will prepend the set of
> directories *only* under precisely that name "${THISDIR}/${PN}", which
> is exactly netbase/netbase, which is wrong.
>
> am i completely misunderstanding what's happening here? as i see
> it, the trivial fix is to simply tweak the .bbappend file to read:
>
> FILESPATH =. "${@base_set_filespath(["${THISDIR}/${PN}-${PV}}"], d)}:"
>
> i already submitted a patch for that to the meta-ti list, i just want
> to confirm that the above really is a bug in the netbase .bbappend
> file in that it won't pick up the overriding interfaces file.
>
> rday
>
> --
>
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
> http://crashcourse.ca
>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
> LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
> ========================================================================
>
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-12 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-06 18:03 slightly confused about .bbappend file and FILESPATH Robert P. J. Day
2012-12-06 18:13 ` Mark Hatle
2012-12-06 18:19 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-12-10 23:03 ` Martin Jansa
2012-12-11 12:54 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-12-11 19:39 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-12-12 4:57 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2012-12-12 11:35 ` Robert P. J. Day
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121212045736.GA23338@jama.jama.net \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox