From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 6.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net ([178.32.119.138] helo=mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjewV-0003YC-RN for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:45:25 +0100 Received: from mail604.ha.ovh.net (b7.ovh.net [213.186.33.57]) by mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A99810303C1 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:39:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 15 Dec 2012 01:30:44 +0200 Received: from tal33-3-82-233-81-124.fbx.proxad.net (HELO eb-e6520) (eric%eukrea.com@82.233.81.124) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 15 Dec 2012 01:30:41 +0200 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:30:45 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.5 (mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) Message-ID: <20121215003045.3891e66a@eb-e6520> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 13159799586893442498 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.233.81.124 (tal33-3-82-233-81-124.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehjedruddvucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecuhfhrohhmpefgrhhitgcuueornhgrrhguuceovghrihgtsegvuhhkrhgvrgdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpegsrghrvggsohigrdhorhhgpdihohgtthhophhrohhjvggtthdrohhrghdpohhpvghnvghmsggvugguvggurdhorhhgnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhoofggtgfgsehtjeertdertddv X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.502935/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehjedruddvucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecuhfhrohhmpefgrhhitgcuueornhgrrhguuceovghrihgtsegvuhhkrhgvrgdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpegsrghrvggsohigrdhorhhgpdihohgtthhophhrohhjvggtthdrohhrghdpohhpvghnvghmsggvugguvggurdhorhhgnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhoofggtgfgsehtjeertdertddv Subject: Acceptance criteria of barebox bootloader in OE-Core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:45:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I have some recipes building barebox bootloader http://barebox.org/ which I'm using in custom BSP and in meta-fsl-arm : http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/tree/recipes-bsp/barebox This recipe needs a little bit of polish but before doing that I wanted to know if it could be integrated in oe-core like is actually u-boot ? http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot If yes, I'll provide a patch with a working barebox for at least qemuarm. This would allow BSP to share at least the barebox.inc of oe-core/Yocto. Thanks Eric