From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BCC6D3DE for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2013 07:52:51 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,535,1378882800"; d="scan'208";a="410621883" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.158]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2013 07:56:18 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:56:17 +0000 Message-ID: <2012748.zEB8QlG4HV@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.8.0-31-generic; KDE/4.10.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <528A32C4.3030306@intel.com> References: <1383312696-421-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <528A2927.7070009@windriver.com> <528A32C4.3030306@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Otavio Salvador , Saul Wold Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lttng-modules: Update revision to grab last bugfix releases X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:56:25 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday 18 November 2013 07:31:16 Saul Wold wrote: > On 11/18/2013 06:50 AM, Robert Yang wrote: > > On 11/18/2013 10:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Robert Yang > >> > >> wrote: > >>>> This should be considered for Dora as well as it fixes the deadlock > >>>> and building with 3.12 kernels. > >>> > >>> Hi Otavio, thanks for suggesting this for dora, but dora's kernel is > >>> 3.10.11, > >>> and this is an update for lttng-modules, I'm not sure whether dora needs > >>> this. > >>> > >>> Add Saul in the CC list. > >> > >> I think Dora ought to get the new 3.10 kernel updates; this can go > >> along side with it. > > > > Hi Otavio, > > > > I'm sorry, but I'm not sure whether we need update dora's kernel from > > 3.10.11 > > to 3.10.17, since we seldom do the package update for a stable branch, > > let's wait for others' comments:-). > > This is correct, I do not think we will be updating the kernel for a > stable branch. FWIW, there is a precedent for this in dylan - I relied upon Bruce sending patches that he felt were appropriate for the branch, and he did that on at least one occasion. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre