From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-da0-f49.google.com ([209.85.210.49]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvYGe-000322-6U for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:03:20 +0100 Received: by mail-da0-f49.google.com with SMTP id v40so691257dad.22 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:47:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=DE6wm2ZX/XzQGYGmI7wIfXdpioVBqVicAN0bKLnrEPY=; b=pUpsXcxWBVjNko8+wbnRAKOwslVPsQAqbEepG22xUxKNPgf4ihq2NHPWgNoAiZ7YtY dWDhxOo3tnViAAH5F0XkcHnJHg9qBgKPA0k0t3tt2JjqIoc+dQ93hHnCeT6UmxK8lrim CjPYk1xgp1VO55asWNvpeP7TIzGu9lwe/WtlEeVGXktIEy3RNRe3JZ+NpRNnJVLUfKVw Uhep/HqBiAFSQNwJtT6UGOSIRjOsY8ntWwpu+WL8vnQa6GD045wS4Yt1S78DMktO2CCs TpMWLznhoFsTx4mYBkP99vloZ/MoKV08v+n0KuqYmMNg0gnYpTBoHSEUQsP1TfIwK+XG yxLA== X-Received: by 10.68.234.36 with SMTP id ub4mr5509773pbc.68.1358362077126; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:47:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-62-24-80-7.net.upcbroadband.cz. [62.24.80.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qf7sm12722874pbb.49.2013.01.16.10.47.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:47:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:47:59 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: Chris Larson Message-ID: <20130116184759.GG3002@jama> References: <20130116115800.A69171034D@opal> <20130116140919.GD3002@jama> <1358350681.1665.31.camel@empanada> <1358354428.1665.54.camel@empanada> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [oe-commits] Tom Zanussi : lttng2-ust: rename to lttng-ust X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:03:24 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 33913 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="e5bfZ/T2xnjpUIbw" Content-Disposition: inline --e5bfZ/T2xnjpUIbw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:02:41AM -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Tom Zanussi wrot= e: >=20 > > This is for the userspace tracing part, lttng-ust, which AFAIK doesn't > > require any kernel patches. > > >=20 > Yes, but the point was, as far as I know, the newer ust requires the newer > kernel components, and the older requires the older kernel components, so > technically the package upgrade on a device is likely to change the > behavior. >=20 > I didn't say the current version required patches, the point was about the > upgrade path for this recipe. I suspect we're one of the only companies > that was actually using the old recipes, and we don't particularly care > about the binary package upgrade paths at this time, but again, this is > *not* a particularly smooth binary package upgrade path. I expect we're > fine with that, but I wanted make sure it was an explicit conscious choice > of behavior, not something unexpected. =46rom what you said it looks like recipe shouldn't be renamed in first place. I'm not interested in lttng, first I was commenting only about recipe being renamed without RPROVIDES/RREPLEACES/RCONFLICTS combo and then I was surprised to see that ERROR about version downgrade from buildhistory. Cheers, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --e5bfZ/T2xnjpUIbw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlD29d8ACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBw8KwCePdf4+Oa+B6WnFug9y1yw+MeW 4I4AoJZSWiJXtSckr9pDBxrQ8HcRVom2 =DV98 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --e5bfZ/T2xnjpUIbw--