From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U32H5-0002ci-Su for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:30:44 +0100 Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id bj3so716713pad.6 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 02:14:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=Oeu03rBc+G/pwk1IXZigHtd61XfCAstla8NERlIumtE=; b=Mv27tw0kwpgsZGsZzwgBHzA3Ud7U30RE/x78wTmPX/T1J1PzjPYYWTq8nIonNnk/Zu vA5GuSYKXDPlNJ7Z+QtV4H/tj9qEXGPA3JnGZ1XlehPyMoHek8wrIsbUM7yrm3ztVwwu 1JiqQcaHINaZFashXntOtpJPYubskXV4AURSoFFaCJM6hV07F283JsP+WsJ7ygIgyEgx 18M1DdBnwHdrsu62aS/HDd+yVbe5D4liRN24SQKsNEefIkBtLt3VKFAvaHit8kDeysTw NVXqGUhyhG94CXlVqv9ysjA4TJ+YPGtzxvvQVabI8N9bNvDiHH9jWv9IdSyPZ4/AY2iV Z1vA== X-Received: by 10.66.74.2 with SMTP id p2mr74549107pav.55.1360145691973; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 02:14:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-62-24-80-7.net.upcbroadband.cz. [62.24.80.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6sm36577067paw.19.2013.02.06.02.14.49 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Feb 2013 02:14:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:14:42 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: Gary Thomas Message-ID: <20130206101442.GS3271@jama> References: <1359990723-21304-1-git-send-email-constantinx.musca@intel.com> <5110DF13.7010502@mlbassoc.com> <5112293F.4080503@mlbassoc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5112293F.4080503@mlbassoc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Otavio Salvador , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] netbase: split up in netbase and init-ifupdown X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:30:45 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 35091 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kERJ49nCKmnv470N" Content-Disposition: inline --kERJ49nCKmnv470N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:58:23AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2013-02-05 06:14, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: > >> On 2013-02-04 08:12, Constantin Musca wrote: > >>> > >>> - netbase should only include etc-rpc, etc-protocols, etc-services > >>> and the hosts file > >>> - the init script/configuration files should be in another package > >>> (init-ifupdown) > >> > >> > >> What is the benefit of such an intrusive change? > >> Why not just have the netbase recipe create a separate package? > > > > Many images use different network managers so ifupdown might not be > > need; thus the split. Is it what you're concerned about? >=20 > The massive renames and new recipe. I think it should be possible > to split the ifup/ifdown functions and keep the 'netbase' recipe. But ifup/ifdown are sometimes MACHINE_ARCH and the rest is TUNE_PKGARCH. So it makes sense to split them. --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --kERJ49nCKmnv470N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlESLRIACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBxC+QCgpy61VX0EiTXRKzNi2SZDJ29K uz8An27wM67ZpkFAOCZXrxPhTWAuHs1I =n1lC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kERJ49nCKmnv470N--