Re: [PATCH v5] netbase: split up in netbase and init-ifupdown

Martin Jansa
2013-02-06T10:30:44Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1035 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:58:23AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2013-02-05 06:14, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
> >> On 2013-02-04 08:12, Constantin Musca wrote:
> >>>
> >>> - netbase should only include etc-rpc, etc-protocols, etc-services
> >>> and the hosts file
> >>> - the init script/configuration files should be in another package
> >>> (init-ifupdown)
> >>
> >>
> >> What is the benefit of such an intrusive change?
> >> Why not just have the netbase recipe create a separate package?
> >
> > Many images use different network managers so ifupdown might not be
> > need; thus the split. Is it what you're concerned about?
>
> The massive renames and new recipe. I think it should be possible
> to split the ifup/ifdown functions and keep the 'netbase' recipe.

But ifup/ifdown are sometimes MACHINE_ARCH and the rest is TUNE_PKGARCH.

So it makes sense to split them.

--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]