Re: [PATCH v5] netbase: split up in netbase and init-ifupdown

Gary Thomas
2013-02-06T10:14:17Z

On 2013-02-05 06:14, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
>> On 2013-02-04 08:12, Constantin Musca wrote:
>>>
>>> - netbase should only include etc-rpc, etc-protocols, etc-services
>>> and the hosts file
>>> - the init script/configuration files should be in another package
>>> (init-ifupdown)
>>
>>
>> What is the benefit of such an intrusive change?
>> Why not just have the netbase recipe create a separate package?
>
> Many images use different network managers so ifupdown might not be
> need; thus the split. Is it what you're concerned about?

The massive renames and new recipe. I think it should be possible
to split the ifup/ifdown functions and keep the 'netbase' recipe.

--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------