From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCTb1-0002H9-1e for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:30:30 +0100 Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id bj3so3108445pad.6 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:13:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=aDIaS/fSASYPizHr+h4Ds31fe5ezBMkckapFGjCwuoE=; b=KyMDL7E4i/PzXLefU88GQgVa1F8MBLvTWSp+7s7i87++IXRZLIvTfJv1Eo+DrlLieQ MFFu7JltEKPToRo+J4yJaGi4w7zHnnpVyirgqSGHU2F2MhZZU7zIeZmEBSFagFb8yT0X 2zfAQ/Exnpb6CrIeNN0xIOpNe6WosbXqz5/NRvrvG4YQzc8uAvHJvV8udQd8Mmjiismg cuZjF7Tfb5RIVJvQQ3tqe/brd2JR9Fd/Uuaiw3MWDfkrNPqbhLZcrITObRZQareT22SZ ZAbVXf+84yLaLm16WWvBgBecNv8o+JplkdzPtvgXYvbp/H5Cjh5eIDx9JvZ0uUQT87AZ RVyA== X-Received: by 10.66.76.41 with SMTP id h9mr32257507paw.1.1362395630632; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:13:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-62-24-80-7.net.upcbroadband.cz. [62.24.80.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm9020829pbn.23.2013.03.04.03.13.46 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:13:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:13:37 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: Richard Purdie Message-ID: <20130304111337.GG3268@jama> References: <1362393439-23933-1-git-send-email-laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> <1362394572.29587.10.camel@ted> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1362394572.29587.10.camel@ted> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] sstate.bbclass: consider postinstall dependencies too X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:30:33 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 36181 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+1TulI7fc0PCHNy3" Content-Disposition: inline --+1TulI7fc0PCHNy3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:56:12AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 11:51 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Shouldn't this list be defined in layer.conf like > > SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFE, so that other layers can extend that > > list? >=20 > I'm hoping we only have very small list of these problematic > dependencies. If we end up with a large number of them then yes, we'd > need to abstract it but I'd prefer to avoid that unless proven > necessary. >=20 > Is there a specific case you have in mind? Isn't systemd-systemctl-native another candidate to be included? --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --+1TulI7fc0PCHNy3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlE0geEACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBwXiQCgqPY/G6NQQq29pdCTU88sGII1 1lYAoKpS6vRq6DlQI8Uo716cOG7abVDw =92j7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+1TulI7fc0PCHNy3--