From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCU8V-0004Gk-Fj for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 13:04:57 +0100 Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fb11so3144525pad.0 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:48:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=WHdkLoIG5sdkD7fUj1wz5CPCQ6NXP4sKTfNtYWigc74=; b=WOB+MgWdnfG0sF8cB3C8EKJl8Wk2tIgDtF5dWC2jI0W+EF4J7tUmKrCycDvCokZGbF eFaP9kK/jnF1RursFc6x7jLaOi4efpNcSHtPbdzYWdArVxyFcaRuXfivYs5kHzyksVKR J5H3ffSYmKRWrG+Nw+79FnA1+Skv8ByT5Y4vYEgtvge6pgJFw8cQzdgqJQz7ljenIA7g UoCg0XydHSPZ+rb6gBInPqVoy1EPZs8a9DuhAJPsTupbZcb3woMwp/OhZ9Ur60HBPnjJ 8xAodfGyTaF5GCONaMBJ5Pz4ws2EO1DP+r3aNDghRq2EOyTfy2yHr/w0FvWX/22s/YF7 kKKQ== X-Received: by 10.68.178.132 with SMTP id cy4mr6384435pbc.208.1362397707167; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:48:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-62-24-80-7.net.upcbroadband.cz. [62.24.80.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qb10sm22072576pbb.43.2013.03.04.03.48.23 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:48:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:48:15 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: Laurentiu Palcu Message-ID: <20130304114815.GH3268@jama> References: <1362393439-23933-1-git-send-email-laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> <1362394572.29587.10.camel@ted> <20130304111337.GG3268@jama> <513487B9.8000502@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <513487B9.8000502@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] sstate.bbclass: consider postinstall dependencies too X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:04:58 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 36186 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gTtJ75FAzB1T2CN6" Content-Disposition: inline --gTtJ75FAzB1T2CN6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:38:33PM +0200, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 03/04/2013 01:13 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:56:12AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > >> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 11:51 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > >>> Shouldn't this list be defined in layer.conf like > >>> SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFE, so that other layers can extend that > >>> list? > >> > >> I'm hoping we only have very small list of these problematic > >> dependencies. If we end up with a large number of them then yes, we'd > >> need to abstract it but I'd prefer to avoid that unless proven > >> necessary. > >> > >> Is there a specific case you have in mind? > >=20 > > Isn't systemd-systemctl-native another candidate to be included? > >=20 > It looks like it should be in the list... I'll resend a new version. what about all u-a-native implementations? --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --gTtJ75FAzB1T2CN6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlE0if8ACgkQN1Ujt2V2gByamwCgncmxRbM+58GD7IK16Ytr/Isz yJkAoJBkIfDr4KmtoefxGGmQIHzlCZp3 =1TOP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gTtJ75FAzB1T2CN6--