From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ea0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UPhiw-0007NZ-NA for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:13:18 +0200 Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id m14so3036824eaj.5 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:55:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=t1LCwbBTb/FqIREwuMUPBoVsxVKIbQ+MyqooAjzT7UU=; b=uTAHw0bcTGNFSWP0LxxDm/lVhXz2zCizo10jluZzaqsI61+gDlhjoQYh6jwkKFQwSH tjXXnlnnDfkN6xGoZlrbra7GZ2ju8XmbxbGmxLJsFUi2oU0HC0pYsPTT39TS7jv09T3/ PKFZDySdtGnBbvdjnkMwjITrzco+RLRMRaLhmB5ECkKihuHHkSOf0rqIfCBcD9g2OQ24 phN0faVL5Qr9l1Tq4opECOrC20p/ig9UhibWWMZle438jOnEJcok6qP3NQ91RZqKZvE2 Np4hRW1+J2wxID4dIfjad82JAE7doVmYXqqb/EzXzIzGtnArr/3wahlrxGYXHBY9tlx8 18BQ== X-Received: by 10.14.183.198 with SMTP id q46mr64815555eem.1.1365548150029; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-62-24-80-7.net.upcbroadband.cz. [62.24.80.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b5sm8735598eew.16.2013.04.09.15.55.48 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:55:49 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Phil Blundell Message-ID: <20130409225549.GG2474@jama> References: <5482882.4phbAeRO1n@helios> <1364318752.6320.27.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> <6500457.3vgtoKXQDv@helios> <1365541265.2116.9.camel@pb-ThinkPad-R50e> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1365541265.2116.9.camel@pb-ThinkPad-R50e> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Paul Eggleton , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rm_work.bbclass: inhibit rm_work per recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:13:26 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 37703 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UKNXkkdQCYZ6W5l3" Content-Disposition: inline --UKNXkkdQCYZ6W5l3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:01:05PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 17:52 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > I'm sure this has come up before, but is rm_old_work something we ought= to=20 > > have in OE-Core? >=20 > Obviously it's not for me to say, but I suspect probably not. It > requires ${WORKDIR} to follow a particular pattern, which not everybody That pattern is now default in oe-core: commit 05075cf3138d1c61f5cf4fe0e1a4587acc00c692 Author: Richard Purdie Date: Fri Nov 16 15:35:53 2012 +0000 bitbake.conf/sanity: Separate versions and PN stamp components into separate directories for WORKDIR and STAMP > will necessarily want, and I don't think you could really argue that it > represents "core" functionality either. I think that in some cases it's more useful then rm_work. IMHO only missing part is good documentation (or better name) describing rm_work/rm_work_old difference: 1) rm_work is much better for builds in tmpfs 2) rm_work_old is better then rm_work if you have enough space to keep 1 WORKDIR for each component you're building --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --UKNXkkdQCYZ6W5l3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFknHUACgkQN1Ujt2V2gByiLACgjnNRVWfl81OG2ZV2TMSfKZOT qu0AoI80Aww1PxRQAQ3BvHqxVocapU2J =0ZJa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UKNXkkdQCYZ6W5l3--