From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-da0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UcuK9-00082R-HG; Thu, 16 May 2013 11:18:19 +0200 Received: by mail-da0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y19so1531824dan.0 for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 01:59:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=04/ONADKS7Mi4ewX9muORtckIEFsVAjc/IM925baBXo=; b=xiBKwhAVZPIO/p/RHPBy5qVawasluwJfZSTaywUMdRteXeudrnMQCbHTN5NK0uYpi6 gqzN3jvAo3YpMp21xPrpw9podU7A7wWmy6KCZqJmXzlpJqJeOQTqLpgCnPddJZL+VdEl LwJ2J9GLueDT8vjawQYJUD0oF6uOuiFc2GVlIVzaS8RVmZdc3GCcGR19F3FYvErjXW3i szzWa6B/Zaerki87aG5aAxLxTIzQp9bMGI4Pt/e7GKUQzEu9emmn4WOoX4ASTG18pEAU a/4xL/KpdpsAB//XGCFi3PqTbinOGKFD/I8Y6oBWmxxktcwAVbhYxq4dIZ/f11qjXMZt Wbdw== X-Received: by 10.68.129.10 with SMTP id ns10mr42512914pbb.13.1368694794642; Thu, 16 May 2013 01:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-62-24-80-145.net.upcbroadband.cz. [62.24.80.145]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id zy5sm6011894pbb.43.2013.05.16.01.59.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 16 May 2013 01:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:59:54 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Paul Eggleton Message-ID: <20130516085954.GC24809@jama.dyndns-home.com> References: <40EC58CA-E878-4F77-8E39-4F8D86F48E29@dominion.thruhere.net> <1499979.6pTC18VfFV@helios> <879938A8-B7BD-4FA6-A38B-F2DDF9D5A48B@dominion.thruhere.net> <2253707.h5Yg7SAvOu@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2253707.h5Yg7SAvOu@helios> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Koen Kooi , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-core layer Subject: Re: [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:18:20 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 39322 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x" Content-Disposition: inline --mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote: > > The flip side is that adding BSP layers becomes a lot safer. I don't mi= nd > > adding layers. Adding layers is easy. >=20 > For distros like Angstrom it is, yes, as I said above. >=20 > > Removing layers is pretty much impossible, though. >=20 > With PRINC gone would there be any other issue that would make removing l= ayers=20 > a problem? Does PR service really fix removing layers? I don't think so, if you add layer and checksum of foo is changed AUTOPR is incremented, but then you remove the layer and the checksum is unfortunately the same as what you had before AUTOPR will go backwards. PRINCs were doing this at least consistently and in reproducible way, removing layer with PR service will cause only some AUTOPRs going backwards (if there were other changes in between). --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlGUoAoACgkQN1Ujt2V2gByUtwCgi0/3g/LiksRGfglgpFGYtQWn 0zkAoLDG3jJAGIa+K3flctfx/SE2+VrA =+JOz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x--