From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UcumO-0002ej-Q2; Thu, 16 May 2013 11:48:12 +0200 Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id bg2so2319421pad.25 for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 02:29:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=4VaiHp83U83s5XuGzj4Pt1WhSUTQt+zy9Q1uPj0KL9I=; b=eL9gfqM/biW/ShOK3B8I13JFeh/WyK4E11nsJhw6Mv6OBEXEr1Vy9NWHKCjzTV7i58 NOfqXdRg4k+kBxVoes579V1e3vd3uVaXuQj/yXBd7nRowAl51XbQqW7gjUrtoXigxyqN HT47BwQz3qfVVPIw9XtVOvXkgj9stAP5vhgJm2iDMWvc2GaZ00gQ+I48CDIHKq1w4fYE fuSGFVCayvt6mBPPUNyIKoUjFsiNAntjZ6Vns9Ee+mpYaymPg5dGapApN6m13OkzLp2W kdngqzpk+/jfGCQIBA/TxgPgAAHZSLr8DC5WqxCs8r/LBP3xtgShr/zHRN1VpzVA6Wbk 3WyQ== X-Received: by 10.66.189.130 with SMTP id gi2mr770411pac.89.1368696546043; Thu, 16 May 2013 02:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-62-24-80-145.net.upcbroadband.cz. [62.24.80.145]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id zo4sm6127997pbc.21.2013.05.16.02.29.03 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 16 May 2013 02:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:29:05 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Paul Eggleton Message-ID: <20130516092905.GG24809@jama.dyndns-home.com> References: <40EC58CA-E878-4F77-8E39-4F8D86F48E29@dominion.thruhere.net> <2253707.h5Yg7SAvOu@helios> <20130516085954.GC24809@jama.dyndns-home.com> <24887939.8KrA2KDk4J@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <24887939.8KrA2KDk4J@helios> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Koen Kooi , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-core layer Subject: Re: [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:48:50 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 39330 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4eRLI4hEmsdu6Npr" Content-Disposition: inline --4eRLI4hEmsdu6Npr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote: > > > > Removing layers is pretty much impossible, though. > > >=20 > > > With PRINC gone would there be any other issue that would make removi= ng > > > layers a problem? > >=20 > > Does PR service really fix removing layers? I don't think so, if you add > > layer and checksum of foo is changed AUTOPR is incremented, but then you > > remove the layer and the checksum is unfortunately the same as what you > > had before AUTOPR will go backwards. >=20 > Then I would have to say if that's not the behaviour you want we should c= hange=20 > it or at least make it optional to force it to always increment even if t= he=20 > checksum is the same as a previous value. That won't work with multiple builders using the same PR server (I don't wont other builders to always increment PRAUTOs used in builds which populate official feed). --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --4eRLI4hEmsdu6Npr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlGUpuEACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBy6bACdFmqzSAHhCMNU4hPzVsgD/Erh PUAAn1nhUmhZloxmCCWhNsYe4r+uK48k =bNuW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4eRLI4hEmsdu6Npr--