From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: Remove unnecessary cd and rm
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 00:16:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130521221615.GG32431@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519BE69F.9060606@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2045 bytes --]
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:26:55PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> Please include a a comment. The burden is on the submitter to prove
> the cd and the rm are unnecessary, not the reviewer.
>
>
> On 05/21/2013 08:39 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > ---
> > meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 7 ++-----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> > index 3320747..47a96c5 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> > @@ -378,13 +378,10 @@ kernel_do_deploy() {
> > ln -sf ${MODULE_TARBALL_BASE_NAME}.bin ${MODULE_TARBALL_SYMLINK_NAME}
> > fi
> >
> > - cd ${DEPLOYDIR}
> > - rm -f ${KERNEL_IMAGE_SYMLINK_NAME}.bin
> > - ln -sf ${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin ${KERNEL_IMAGE_SYMLINK_NAME}.bin
> > - ln -sf ${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}
> > + ln -sf ${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin ${DEPLOYDIR}/${KERNEL_IMAGE_SYMLINK_NAME}.bin
> > + ln -sf ${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin ${DEPLOYDIR}/${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}
>
> So we are now in a different directory (do we know which one?) but the
> source of the ln commands doesn't change. If we are in the same
> directory, then why add DEPLOYDIR to the destination?
yes we know which one - ${B} as defined in deploy.bbclass:
do_deploy[dirs] = "${DEPLOYDIR} ${B}", and the same is defined again (maybe unnecessary) in
kernel.bbclass
DEPLOYDIR is defined in deploy.bbclass as well
DEPLOYDIR = "${WORKDIR}/deploy-${PN}"
DEPLOYDIR is used as target for every other file deployed by do_deploy,
this was just unnecessary switching CWD to create relative symlink and I
have no idea why rm -f was used together with ln -sf.
I'll send v2, because
ln -sf ${MODULE_TARBALL_BASE_NAME}.bin ${MODULE_TARBALL_SYMLINK_NAME}
is wrong.
See related
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass?id=fd5d80ab1a405cb4ef94f2cde25f8c251da490f0
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-21 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-21 15:39 [PATCH] kernel: Remove unnecessary cd and rm Martin Jansa
2013-05-21 21:26 ` Darren Hart
2013-05-21 21:41 ` Darren Hart
2013-05-21 22:16 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2013-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH] kernel: Remove unnecessary cd and rm, fix MODULE_TARBALL_SYMLINK_NAME creation Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130521221615.GG32431@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox