From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ea0-f179.google.com (mail-ea0-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D0E6AA19 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b15so5210716eae.10 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:36:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IIbVh6PtD/BTgd5aV/DV0DIpD0ylKpKTT3aY64PMxUw=; b=K6D5QBUV9gpsDTcuZgXyfJBsGzEmrQ5w3FVfSmGs0H2ZeAeo/QHi5MOTM37oFZnWbk ez+R468AStL+UJQMvmnbTnL4Y8h6aBX+SH/qTavxoA6XZ6EwP3xDzswTV4RES5di5qFa I+DA5qp/JW6r2YX2t1O8ZMqIBfaLLm31WL6IHMNFgu7C1gwR6o3QeXeqAiJB3IQRKwf6 R8bEE/3Xbu4juHKh8gde36HNCy7pS51WmN2LXUlb8QrXmY+PGHgtXI2dZKDpKmnTv/SW Rr4zeWmKsD8P/yaUD9DUii1zDZsh7MFhjsCP3wxPadBEpW5CABK7FuoiA8YuU3kuRaA9 ahWg== X-Received: by 10.15.90.139 with SMTP id q11mr17098171eez.137.1370964979978; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-62-24-80-145.net.upcbroadband.cz. [62.24.80.145]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f9sm13036881eev.9.2013.06.11.08.36.18 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:36:43 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Khem Raj Message-ID: <20130611153643.GG3233@jama> References: <1370009480-32681-1-git-send-email-marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> <1370963003.27750.80.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [RFC] get minimal rootfs to be even smaller X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:36:19 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 40483 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XaUbO9McV5wPQijU" Content-Disposition: inline --XaUbO9McV5wPQijU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 08:22:27AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > Er, don't RRECOMMENDS always go into the build dependency list? >=20 > if they do then whats the difference between DEPENDS and RRECOMMENDS > functionally. RDEPENDS and RRECOMMENDS right? > since now rrecommended packages will always be available and they will > always make into images. just the possibility to "blacklist" them with BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS. --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --XaUbO9McV5wPQijU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlG3RAsACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBwpGwCeLRcagOwtH2GTUsC6nNceN8NU wIsAnRxF1G92WnUspHTBjmD3PXRiFOPW =Ny24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XaUbO9McV5wPQijU--