From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from exchange07.timesys.com (exchange07.timesys.com [209.114.137.116]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB5D6AA80 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from timesys.com (192.168.3.27) by exchange07.timesys.com (192.168.1.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.436.0; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:13:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:13:54 -0400 From: Andy Voltz To: Saul Wold Message-ID: <20130612171354.GC12032@timesys.com> References: <1371055081-15301-1-git-send-email-andy.voltz@timesys.com> <51B8A870.6040900@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <51B8A870.6040900@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] tune-cortexa*.inc: fix tunings for cortex a5, a7, a8, a9, a15 machines. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:13:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Hi Saul, On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:57:20PM -0400, Saul Wold wrote: > On 06/12/2013 09:38 AM, Andy Voltz wrote: > > Using CORTEX_ID variable reference in the tuning overrides did not work. > > This reverts those changes, and adds a tuning file for the cortex-a5. > > > > Revert "tune-cortexa5.inc: Add tune file for cortex-a5" > > Revert "tune-cortexa.inc: create a common include for cortex-a armv7a tuning" > > > Andy, does this patch supersede your -mtune not -mcpu patch? I seem to > have some trouble applying this patch. > Yes. Sorry I thought that patch was NACK/dead. > It might be best to provide a series that includes the reverts with > appropriate commit messages. > Sure, I can send as a series. Regards -- Andy Voltz Timesys Corporation