Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: wenzong fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: About PACKAGECONFIG audit
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:34:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130815103422.GB17945@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520CAA18.1080706@windriver.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1353 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 06:14:48PM +0800, wenzong fan wrote:
> On 08/15/2013 05:44 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > Hi Wenzong,
> >
> > On Thursday 15 August 2013 17:29:46 wenzong fan wrote:
> >> We have seen some problems like this:
> >>
> >> $ bitbake libcap
> >>
> >> ld: warning: libaudit.so.1, needed by .../lib64/libpam.so, not found
> >> .../lib64/libpam.so: undefined reference to `audit_open'
> >> .../lib64/libpam.so: undefined reference to `audit_close'
> >> ......
> >>
> >> The libaudit has been available and libpam build with it, after we run
> >> another build with sstate-cache and w/o libaudit, the error occurs. The
> >> solution in these cases is to use PACKAGECONFIG to lay out dependencies
> >> on optional packages and make them explicit. We need to run an audit and
> >> catch all of these issues.
> >>
> >> A probable ways maybe:
> >>
> >> 1) Run world build to generate the sysroots as much as possible;
> >
> > (See Ross's reply for a pointer to the new test-dependencies script)
> 
> That would be a good start point, I have run that script once, but looks 
> not any failure occurs.

I don't believe it, see "State of bitbake world" thread where I've sent
results from last 3 executions.

There is plenty of issues for everybody :)

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-15 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-15  9:29 About PACKAGECONFIG audit wenzong fan
2013-08-15  9:38 ` Burton, Ross
2013-08-15  9:43 ` Phil Blundell
2013-08-15 10:22   ` Martin Jansa
2013-08-16 10:41   ` Richard Purdie
2013-08-16 10:51     ` Phil Blundell
2013-08-15  9:44 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-08-15 10:14   ` wenzong fan
2013-08-15 10:34     ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2013-08-19 20:46 ` Randy MacLeod
2013-08-20  5:36   ` wenzong fan
2013-08-22  5:53     ` Randy MacLeod

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130815103422.GB17945@jama \
    --to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=wenzong.fan@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox