From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net (vms173001pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.1]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0396BE4F for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [108.45.150.102]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MSV001U19GVW2Q0@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 11:22:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3B54A200A9; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 12:22:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 12:22:07 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Richard Purdie Message-id: <20130909162207.GF5834@denix.org> References: <20130906185741.GA5834@denix.org> <20130909135125.GD5834@denix.org> <1378740263.3484.122.camel@ted> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <1378740263.3484.122.camel@ted> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: eglibc_2.17.bb: Failure expanding variable SELECTED_OPTIMIZATION[:=] X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 16:22:29 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 04:24:23PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 09:51 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > Any ideas or suggestions at this point would be greatly appreciated! Thanks. Richard, > I have vague recollections about this from something happening in > master. Perhaps try with: > > http://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=4d50690489ee8dc329a9b0c7bc4ceb29b71e95e9 > > applied. This might things more deterministic, perhaps always breaking > or perhaps never. Ah, good call! Massaging the patch onto 1.18 seems to have solved the parsing breakage - it passed 10 out of 10 tries so far. I'll keep testing and run a few real builds, but would you be willing to backport it to 1.18? Please let me know if you need an updated patch re-submitted. Thanks. > Have you got two definitions of the "get_optimization" function? I grepped through all my layers and eglibc_2.17.inc is the only place where it gets defined and used. -- Denys