From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D79060F86 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e53so2674753eek.27 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 03:28:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FAW82JvLWcMhQ4YbOVc0gz1Ixyd5tHqo1jzTGXcFN5o=; b=Umu9vCKhKshnO/2Qzo14Uyde6nGANFI6AXsWspQC3pdqkGUc7n0zqT7h89Pnc4Dapv ySWmDFUngzMcgtDPD0k//TjGTjmbP7ZYrhaKHefoRfBln3Y1CR4cxSt1h0/3iM66BxsR JOBdzw4U+1eIighOe5zNkPUiHIeKLjkpI+lL1D6E0YgyCH0HZ1/dlN22UtAvMHwHEi8d ZPgo3MPWpAokalGByPpB6vAGamml69NtYfJGFKAg8UFOVJAoae++okzU2/1vv43236zx 8GLY88gvLdVeVAHfuefAdD+z2s2+9MVyCXrTfXUytGeuVxJaVOhtagDY8DAjkfXZBZQ4 V22Q== X-Received: by 10.14.210.8 with SMTP id t8mr19165055eeo.39.1379413734676; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 03:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-62-24-80-145.net.upcbroadband.cz. [62.24.80.145]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm49667577eem.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 03:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 12:30:29 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Khem Raj Message-ID: <20130917103029.GA7313@jama> References: <1379114920-23851-1-git-send-email-jslater@windriver.com> <523501AC.4010208@linux.intel.com> <5237E49C.7090608@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Joe Slater , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] webkit-gtk: limit ld memory requirement X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:28:54 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 45129 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN" Content-Disposition: inline --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:31:18PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Kang Kai wrote: > > Without patch: > > real 76m1.646s > > user 86m36.704s > > sys 38m39.103s > > > > With patch: > > real 63m36.193s > > user 86m9.274s > > sys 37m48.431s > > > > It seems the link option doesn't increase the compile time. >=20 > on the contrary its reducing the build time which is kind of > interesting and seems a win-win. are you able to extract the failing > link command and just run that with/without the linker option to > discard memory ? and measure just the linking time on the host where > it already builds without this option? I think someone should measure it on machine with a lot of ram. If the test was executed on machine where it was linking mostly from swap, then it's not so surprising it was faster with the option enabled. --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlI4L0UACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBwm6QCfV7vNL/Apl47+CJwzBFPu3kis YTUAoK9BWOpmjbe2vOF1QkYqgxM+k83g =q0vQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN--