From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (mail-ee0-f41.google.com [74.125.83.41]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E666D145 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 00:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id t10so1013801eei.0 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:32:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=k3Eg6Fmk5xrmtxx3X+k7UCaARWIOc0vZ7ylgpXwYI4Q=; b=oOZTg+0ywCHaCIJX4ePVosOsAiJawYhqYLCYscgZPYDMwlIn2FKD2TsECPAlKme8m5 xanToSS0W0NiHR2qEpRsBEU0b5gyhD6zjoYjxfb19RXrhVZ5qcLNUAvbMlK81jeP1oE1 0NuBawE9FrmwOkM0ImUwdKUFmazvLebo+L6KRP5SaEOBF14ohzqeTUZvs6S7bPMxHFGi AGoTf6KFAwSc33LYmE+0G822RPdmg8qI7qPfqIjsMdx4UCfJXeT+V92NJl2SdiVqBDpH yG/YO7Liy9dSrZ+V+z0mfF6m49b+IjQzXyCgpu8FBN/ImprvqztqCUYtduJiGsgKe//n Fo0g== X-Received: by 10.14.3.1 with SMTP id 1mr107291eeg.94.1389227560954; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:32:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-89-176-104-107.net.upcbroadband.cz. [89.176.104.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v7sm723240eel.2.2014.01.08.16.32.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:32:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 01:32:51 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: Paul Eggleton Message-ID: <20140109003251.GD3709@jama> References: <52CC470A.9030302@linaro.org> <1759035.6JVm74GdRW@helios> <52CD9CAB.5020501@linaro.org> <3583228.liS9SqzWlO@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3583228.liS9SqzWlO@helios> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Qt in OE-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:32:42 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 48741 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1YtYzP3stTOlsn9I" Content-Disposition: inline --1YtYzP3stTOlsn9I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:21:08PM +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > In my opinion... > >=20 > > Personally I would be in favour of removing GTK+ and the GNOME UI from > > the core and putting them in their own layer for all the same reasons I > > think Qt should be in its own layer: > > - a "basic" image doesn't need them > > - we can have different layers to track separate major releases (as with > > qt3, qt4, and qt5) >=20 > The trouble is, if you have no toolkit at all, how do you test that X sti= ll=20 > works properly? The selection we have provides a single unit allowing us = to=20 > test the entire stack reasonably well without having to add anything else= =2E I=20 > think that's a valuable thing to have. By testing oe-core + layer with X. Everybody else is using oe-core + couple of other layers, why do we need to make oe-core testable with X _in single_ layer? I'm not saying that oe-core should be tested with 30 layers like my world build, but why cannot AB have special build which builds oe-core + meta-xorg + meta-gnome and runs some runtime QA tests on that and then some other build with oe-core + meta-python for piglit tests? Is it limitation of AB scripts for builds that they cannot fetch other layers so they need everything glued together with combo-layer? --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --1YtYzP3stTOlsn9I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlLN7jMACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBzDcACfW9O0mJqjbXgw0qcCoOeoEd0I lMkAn1N2dFO0iodIEDAIhbE+EakqKmpM =Ai2b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1YtYzP3stTOlsn9I--