From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE91D6CAD5 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2014 07:40:05 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,832,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="454250065" Received: from lpalcu-linux.rb.intel.com (HELO lpalcu-linux) ([10.237.105.45]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2014 07:40:03 -0800 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:40:01 +0200 From: Laurentiu Palcu To: Phil Blundell Message-ID: <20140212154001.GG10078@lpalcu-linux> References: <1392216272.14769.270.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> <20140212145552.GF10078@lpalcu-linux> <1392217651.14769.271.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1392217651.14769.271.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] (image|rootfs_ipk).bbclass, rootfs.py: ipk multilib fixes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:40:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:07:31PM +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:55 +0200, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: > > * /usr/lib/opkg is where the alternatives go; > > Isn't that a bug? I'm far from being an expert in opkg or update-alternatives, but, looking in /usr/bin/update-alternatives I can see: # admin dir ad="$OPKG_OFFLINE_ROOT/usr/lib/opkg/alternatives" Isn't that expected since the u-a provider is opkg-utils recipe? laurentiu > > p. > >